Re: [Aggregator] Howto remove from persistency

2010-09-25 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Olivier.Roger wrote: >> >> That's exactly the idea. >> >> I agree that deleting messages is dangerous. That's why the option should be >> set explicitly (disabled by default). >> -- > > Feel free to create a ti

Re: can't tranform Body to DOM

2010-09-25 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:33 PM, wrote: > > >> -Message d'origine- >> De : Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com] >> Envoyé : vendredi 24 septembre 2010 15:23 >> À : users@camel.apache.org >> Objet : Re: can't tranform Body to DOM >> >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:17 PM,   >> wrote: >>

Re: can't tranform Body to DOM

2010-09-25 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Donald Whytock wrote: > Would > > org.w3c.dom.Document doc = ex.getIn(org.w3c.dom.Document.class); > > work any better? > It's the same. By passing in the class type you tell Camel to convert the message body to that class type (if needed to do so). > Don > > On

Re: Camel Exchange Patters

2010-09-25 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > But see, that's the thing, the model and api is not based on jbi, and we > should correct that in the wiki as well. Web services use the same model. So > it's really not jbi not even wsdl, but the same model, that's mostly related > to t

Re: Camel Exchange Patters

2010-09-25 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Tarjei Huse wrote: >  On 09/24/2010 03:16 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> That's a bit extreme, but yes, that's the idea. More precisely, not when you >> want to change the Exchange, you cannot do that, but when you want the >> message processed by the remaining o

Re: Camel Exchange Patters

2010-09-25 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Tarjei Huse wrote: >  On 09/24/2010 03:16 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> That's a bit extreme, but yes, that's the idea. More precisely, not when you >> want to change the Exchange, you cannot do that, but when you want the >> message processed by the remaining o

Re: Camel Exchange Patters

2010-09-25 Thread Tarjei Huse
On 09/24/2010 03:16 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > That's a bit extreme, but yes, that's the idea. More precisely, not when you > want to change the Exchange, you cannot do that, but when you want the > message processed by the remaining of the route to be different. > > One more thing to keep in