This is not a problem in Camel.
See comment on ticket.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Very strange indeed...
I'm surprised that you don't get anything more in your log file. It's
as if Camel is not even trying to poll your remote file system. Have
you checked any logs at the sftp server on the other side in order to
find out if Camel is actually trying to list files? Also, have you
Hi guys,
I'm new to apache Camel. It sound really great.
I was trying to build my first application. I got a file with entries of
different type and I want to generate a new file with only a subset of the
lines (in the final version I will have to build up a POJO and send it using
web-service).
Hi Bengt,
I have used the winSCP client to login to the remote server and I see there
is file to pick up. I am also able to move files using the same credential
as my Java program using Camel.On the remote server I have a jail
(chroot) account. That should not make any difference.
Thanks
Manoj,
You seem to succeed in logging in but have you checked (using an ordinary
sftp client) that there are any files to poll at the URL you use?
/Bengt
2010/11/26 manoj.sahu
>
> Thank you for attention Claus!
>
> I had switched on trace :
> log4j.logger.org.apache.camel=TRACE
>
> I did not g
Thanks,
/Bengt
2010/11/28 Claus Ibsen
> Hi
>
> I have created a ticket
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3372
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
> > Claus,
> >
> > It's not really a big deal but I think most people would expect the
> exchange
> > to be flagg
Hi
I have created a ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3372
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
> Claus,
>
> It's not really a big deal but I think most people would expect the exchange
> to be flagged as failed when it, in fact, has failed. If it can be easily
Claus,
It's not really a big deal but I think most people would expect the exchange
to be flagged as failed when it, in fact, has failed. If it can be easily
implemented then yes I would prefer the exchange to be marked as failed.
/Bengt
2010/11/27 Claus Ibsen
> Hi
>
> Since the movedFailed is
