Hello Peter!
The SmppConsumer is started by default if Camel starts and he must be able
to connect the SMSC. The SmppProducer will create the connection to the
SMSC, when the first exchange arrives by default.
As Ben suggested, you can set the autostart option to false
'context.setAutoStartup(Bool
Hi,
This is possible as of Camel 2.7, see http://camel.apache.org/mock.html and
in particular the section called "Mocking existing endpoints with XML DSL".
You may also want to take a look at MockFtpServer (
http://mockftpserver.sourceforge.net/). It's great for writing integration
tests.
Regard
Hello Ade, Willem, Charles,
I updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3756. May be you could
have a look on it. I have a problem with deploying it into ServiceMix
4.3.1-fuse-01-09. With ServiceMix 4.2.0-fuse-02-00 everything works as
expected.
Cheers,
Christian
You mean by using the properties component [1]?
It may not be immediately obvious from the examples there, but you can have
something like
And the 'destination' would be defined in a properties file specific to your
environment. So you'd only have to modify the url in a propert
I'm trying to test a route that moves a message from the file system to an
ftp server. I have a simple route defined as follows:
I'd like to unit test the transfer by using a mock component for the ftp
component. The Camel in Action book has some great examples on using mock
components
Hi Barry,
Claus made that change part of the upgrade to spring 3 because the
SimpleMessageListenerContainer was deprecated. Therefore the consumerType made
no sense anymore as you only have one option, the JmsMessageListenerContainer.
I'll update the docs. Thanks for reporting this!
Hadrian
I see it was removed in revision 1067441. Yet the web site docs still how it
as an option. Also I could not find any indication in the release notes that
it was removed and why.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/FYI-JmsEndpoint-consumerType-removed-but-still-in-do
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:13 PM, simon.kelly wrote:
> So essentially I can't access it once its in the error queue. Is there any
> other way of doing this?
>
Yeah maybe we should keep that information in case people wanted to
access it, or offer it as a property on the Exchange as it thus wont
inf
you should be able to set noAutoStartup() on the routes and then use a
separate process to try to start them later
peter.argalas wrote:
>
> Is there any option how to ignore routes (remove them from context), that
> could not be started and start camel without them?
>
-
Ben O'Day
IT Consu
Thanks very much for the reply. I'll try to set up something similar.
In any case, ~5ms sounds acceptable (I have Tibco EMS to work with).
I'm also getting a hight throughput - my only concern is whith the
responsiveness of the system when there is only one message (for example) -
I don't hav
I'm only using one smtp endpoint. I also send email via logback via the same
smtp server with the same credentials and that never fails. I was looking at
how logback uses javamail vs spring and its quite different. Logback sets up
an authenticator with the transport, where passes the u/p with each
See the Content Enricher EIP
http://camel.apache.org/content-enricher.html
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Simon Kelly wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a situation where I receive a message on a queue and need to
> transform it to send it to a third party. I need to be able to combine the
> response from
So essentially I can't access it once its in the error queue. Is there any
other way of doing this?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Access-CamelRedeliveryCounter-in-error-queue-tp4288089p4291125.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi
I have a situation where I receive a message on a queue and need to
transform it to send it to a third party. I need to be able to combine the
response from the third party with the original message in order to produce
my response. I can't seem to find a way of doing that.
Any assistance great
Hi,
in my project I use 3 routes (each route connects to one SMSC using
camel-smpp).
Problem is that if one SMSC is down, smpp connection cannot be created so
respective route cannot be started and this lead to camel shutdown.
Is there any option how to ignore routes (remove them from context),
That did it! It works now. Thank-you very much.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Has-camel-jboss6-been-added-to-Camal-Extras-yet-tp4289222p4290932.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Claus, this is unfortunately not the same behavior we found out with the
enrich processor (which also use the AggregationStrategy).
We can reproduce the following behavior (with Camel 2.6):
- If the exception is handled, the exception is not anymore set in the
exchange (exchange.getException() as y
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:11 PM, rtmacphail wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the quick response. I tried the updated JAR and modified the
> package name in my camel context configuration. JBoss at least now finds the
> Resolver class. But I'm getting an exception upon deployment:
>
> Caused by: java.lan
Hi,
Thanks for the quick response. I tried the updated JAR and modified the
package name in my camel context configuration. JBoss at least now finds the
Resolver class. But I'm getting an exception upon deployment:
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: log
at
org.apachextras.camel.jboss.
Hi
We need to make it database agnostic so we can't have oracle specific
sql functions in there.
However we should be able to add a row with created_timstamp and use a
java.util.Date object type.
JPA should be able to map that to any database.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Christian Müller
w
You need to enable streaming if you want out-of-order completion of the
splitted messages.
By default Camel will honor the order the messages is splitted, and use the
same order for its aggregation. If you enable streaming, then it aggregates
on-the-fly.
-
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseS
Yeah Camel 3.0 will improve on this as we will refactor and improve
parts of the internal routing engine / builder to cater for that.
So error handlers and the likes is applied in a more dynamic fashion,
instead of as now, as being applied during route build time.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:06 PM,
On 08.04.2011 10:14, Arkadi Shishlov wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 10:58:27 +0300, Claus Straube
wrote:
An empty multicast is no error.
ArrayList l = new ArrayList();
from("direct:a").multicast().to(l);
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Definition has no children on
Multicast[[]]
at
org.a
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 10:58:27 +0300, Claus Straube
wrote:
An empty multicast is no error.
ArrayList l = new ArrayList();
from("direct:a").multicast().to(l);
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Definition has no children on
Multicast[[]]
at
org.apache.camel.model.ProcessorDefinition.crea
On 07.04.2011 22:29, Arkadi Shishlov wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:50:52 +0300, Claus Straube
wrote:
On 07.04.2011 15:33, Arkadi Shishlov wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:24:02 +0300, Andrey Popp <8may...@gmail.com>
wrote:
* Apache Camel should try to compile routes and in the case of
success --
Hi
You can disable mapping JMX messages using mapJmsMessage=false option
See
http://camel.apache.org/jms
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Gert Villemos wrote:
> I post this here and not in the activemq forum, as its a Camel route that
> courses the problem.
>
> In our setup I have Camel routes
Hi
No idea. You can try upgrading the Java Mail API you use. However I
think some of the latest releases requires JDK6 now.
Also we fixed an issue when you had multiple smtp endpoints defined,
where camel-mail would use the default mail session.
In Camel 2.7 it always uses a new mail session inst
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Willem.Jiang wrote:
> As Camel has a async process module, you can't know if the processors are
> called in a single thread.
> If you are using the thread local to store the states, it may be massed up.
>
> My suggestion is store the states information into the Exch
Hi
I have updated the attached JAR file on the ticket. Can you try again.
Mind the package name has changed. So read the comment in the JIRA ticket.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:07 PM, rtmacphail wrote:
> In reference to issue tracker #CAMEL-3825, I am trying to get a copy of the
> camel-jboss6 jar
When i tested Camel on JBoss6 i had the same problem. As a workaround i
got the SourceCode from
http://camel-extra.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/components/camel-jboss/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/jboss/JBossPackageScanClassResolver.java
and changed it:
- the package 'org.jboss.virtual' changed to
30 matches
Mail list logo
