+1
2011/5/9 Claus Ibsen
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Tarjei Huse wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got a route like this:
> > from(bookKeeperQueue).routeId("BookKeeperRoute")
> >.process(new BookKeeperProcessor(bookKeeper));
> >
> > That I would like to test by appending a mock endpoint
Hi
Okay we got an improvement in testing time now
Before: 3h2m
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Camel.trunk.fulltest/276/
After: 2h28m
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Camel.trunk.fulltest/276/
So we cut down the time with: 34m. Which is roughly 20%
Also the assembly part we cannot imp
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Tarjei Huse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got a route like this:
> from(bookKeeperQueue).routeId("BookKeeperRoute")
> .process(new BookKeeperProcessor(bookKeeper));
>
> That I would like to test by appending a mock endpoint to the route and
> avaiting for it to rece
Hi there,
We are attempting to implement an aggregator to implement rules around
preferring messages from one source over another with a timeout.
We have two message sources A and B which are implemented over two physical
networks, and the quality of source A is better than B.
So we have these b
yep, just use http://camel.apache.org/advicewith.html
http://camel.apache.org/advicewith.html and interceptor to decorate with a
mock endpoint that you can assert against...
tarjei wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I got a route like this:
> from(bookKeeperQueue).routeId("BookKeeperRoute")
> .pr
i did a poc,
i need a modification in camel-core, here is the diff:
Index: src/main/java/org/apache/camel/component/bean/BeanInfo.java
===
--- src/main/java/org/apache/camel/component/bean/BeanInfo.java (révision
1100337)
+++ src/mai
On Sat, 07 May 2011 17:54:11 +0300, Hanson wrote:
I just wonder what's the necessity of declaring a JMS component as
transactional basically. If not, when a JMS to JMS route fails, will the
message got lost, in case I have a DefaultErrorHandler and set redelivery
attempts to -1?
What about a Fi
Hi,
I got a route like this:
from(bookKeeperQueue).routeId("BookKeeperRoute")
.process(new BookKeeperProcessor(bookKeeper));
That I would like to test by appending a mock endpoint to the route and
avaiting for it to receive the message.
I could add a .to(log:something) at the
Most of the messages are flowing to splunk fine. A few are failing to get
through - possibly we are flooding splunk - hence those errors.
But what I dont understand is why the process then stops processing any more
messages.
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Filippo Balicchia wrote:
> Does your sp
Hi,
maybe another solution to this problem could be to add a kind of
descriptor file:
in camel a bean can extract parameters from headers or something else
with annotations, if there is a file saying the same thing the bean
could not use any camel imports but do the same.
what do you think of a
10 matches
Mail list logo