Hi gurus,
I have the following issue. I need to send requests to webservice from camel
on timer events.
As timer consumer uses synchronous event firing , only one request can be sent
at the same time. What I’d like is use to threads DSL to process multiple timer
events at the same time.
Here
I'm using JAX-WS, and to step back I'm on CXF2.4.1+Camel 2.4.0 (My bad on
version typo). My use case is to receive client PAYLOAD, process SOAP header
and route to external service for it to process the body and return
response. The issue is, when this external service throws an
Exception/Fault; it
Camel move to JDK 1.6 since 2.7.x.
Are you using camel-jaxrs component ?
I need more information about the "status code 500" error to help you
to find a work around.
On Fri Jan 20 07:19:34 2012, sram wrote:
Our application server is still dependent on Java5. The reason for me to move
to Camel
Our application server is still dependent on Java5. The reason for me to move
to Camel 2.9.0 is to address "status code 500" error thrown when my route
endpoint throws an exception. I believe this was addressed in 2.8.3 and
above. Am i correct? If so, Is Camel 2.8.3 compliant with Java 5, and shoul
Digging into Camel code is the best way to find it out.
It's Camel doing the redelivery, as the redelivery facility should generally
work for all other kinds of components as well and not just ActiveMQ.
Babak
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Redelivery-with-mul
I'm reading again and again the several documentations about transaction and
error handling, and i have one more question:
when working with the transactionErrorHandler
(http://camel.apache.org/transactionerrorhandler.html), and especially when
configuring redelivery (maximumRedeliveries(6)...), i
Thank you for these precisions.
I'll have to make native activemq redelivery work tomorow then !
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Redelivery-with-multiple-transacted-routes-tp5158209p5158921.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Kafe,
that was exactly my intention to make it clear to you that this will NOT be
possible as long as your routing logic is transacted. For instance different
implementations of Spring's PlatformTransactionManager keep the state of the
currently running transaction into a ThreadLocal so that on
@Babak : it seems that the asyncDelayedRedelivery option does not apply to
transacted routes ("However if you use transacted routes then Camel will
block as its mandated by the transaction manager to execute all the work in
the same thread context"). But i'll try that to be sure.
@Raul : actually,
I don't know Spagic. Which capabillities Spagic offers?
Best,
Christian
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:15 AM, jmh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> simple quesiton : is it possible to use Spagic to monitor Camel components
> ?
>
> Regards
> J-M
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabb
If you are using JMS transactions, how about rolling back the
transaction when an exception occurs, and letting AMQ do the
redelivery for you? That way the message will again enter the route at
the beginning (from endpoint).
You do this by configuring a redelivery policy on the connection
factory.
Hi,
the Leader-Rider has already answered this question of yours [1] by another
thread.
[1]
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/What-s-best-practice-for-running-Camel-2-9-0-in-JBOSS-5-X-tp5138775p5145054.html
Babak
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-ftp-sche
Hi
You have 2 when in the choice, which means if both when is false, then
it will pick otherwise. But you do not have that. So you will not see
anything.
Add an to have a log in case any of the when fails.
And the simple expression in Camel 2.8.x or earlier you must be a bit
more exact when usi
Thank you Claus.
I will use the book to know more.
-Anand
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:03 AM, anand sridhar
> wrote:
> > I was hoping the community could help me understand the exact meaning of
> > 'Exchange ending' as mentioned in Cam
Hi All,
For some reason I am not able to see any of the logs defined in the below
route.
Appreciate your help in solving this.
Noticed that if I removed the choice from the second route, all the logging
appears in my log file.
I need to find out which choice loop is executed.
Hi,
I just copy&paste what the documentation says about this second question of
yours:
>From Camel 2.4 onwards Camel has a feature to not block while waiting for a
delayed redelivery to occur. However if you use transacted routes then Camel
will block as its mandated by the transaction manager to
Sure
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/unmarshalling-but-not-marshalling-tp5152663p5158434.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Finally, I used my own LifecycleStrategy implementation to persist the
routes in xml files (onRoutesAdd,onRoutesRemove,onContextStart) .
For the route loading in the context I follow the link.
And for the marshalling i took example inside the
ModelHelper.dumpModelAsXml for the jaxb marshall
The remaining problem is that the thread that makes the redeliveries is
blocked until all redeliveries have been done.
Potentially, if the redeliveryPolicy is configured to redeliver undefinitely
(which will probably be my case in the future) and lot of messages arrive in
my initial ActiveMQ queue
Yeah exactly, all redelivery attempts start at the point of the failure...
BTW this behaviour seems to me in synergy with the plain java where you
catch an Exception some where in your code and then you continue with the
logic right *after* the catch block and not necessarily from the first line
o
i found the property sendEmptyMessageWhenIdle that can allow me to check in
process if no more file are present and stop route by it self.
But in that way i have to develop a custom pollingStrategy?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-ftp-scheduling-and-l
I didn't mean to put an onException() on the second route *but* on the global
scope, so something like:
java.lang.Exception
true
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Redelivery-with-multiple-transacted-r
Hum... actually this seems to be a normal behaviour :
"Point of entry for redelivery attempts
All redelivery attempts start at the point of the failure. So the route:
.onException(ConnectException.class)
.from("direct:start")
.process("processor1")
.process("processor2") // <--- throws a Conne
i try to find how to limit polling but i can't find nothing about...
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-ftp-scheduling-and-limit-polling-tp5158013p5158303.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The problem is that if i put an onException clause on the second route, when
there is a redelivery (after an exception raised by 'processor2'), it
directly starts at the point the exception was raised not at the beginning
of routeA.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.c
Hi
sharing the same transaction boundary doesn't necessarily mean sharing the
same onException clause by two different routes.
In this case defining the onException clause at the global scope should
help. Check also [1] for the global & route specific scope definitions.
[1] http://camel.apache.o
Hi Babak,
Really appreciate your immediate response, due to licensing issues, we will
have to switch to JBoss 5.0, in which case, the camel-jboss would suffice. I
will give a try and update the forum.
Thanks once again.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Issue-wi
Start-level can't really be trusted, especially if you use blueprint
for example, which does actually start the blueprint stuff
asynchronously.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 15:49, Donald Whytock wrote:
> It may be a matter of personal taste, but I disagree with reliance on
> start levels. It should b
Hi,
I have some problem to have a correct redelivery policy in my environment.
I work with transacted routes and i'd like to have 3 redelivery attempts if
any exception is raised.
I have the following routes :
java.lang.Exception
true
<*
Hello All,
This is my route
from("direct:getstreaminfo").startupOrder(2)
.recipientList().method(MessageRouter.class,
"routeTo").parallelProcessing().aggregationStrategy(new
GroupedExchangeAggregationStrategy()).convertBodyTo(String.class)
.proc
Hi,
maybe digging into the unit-tests, like in [1], could give you an idea how
to do that.
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/trunk/components/camel-ftp/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/component/file/remote
Babak
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-f
Hello everyone,
i need to configure an ftp route that allow me to:
schedule starting, then dowload all file present on ftp server, if no file
present polling only for a limited times eg. every 5 seconds for an hour,
than if no file downloaded stop polling, stop route and send an email of
report.
Hi
And yes you can also use a LifecycleStrategy to keep track of those
events when routes is being added/removed.
And then do your store to database / remove from data stuff.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Nicolas Gapaillard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your answer,
>
> I'm not sure it is r
I suggest to convert the result of http4 to a String before sending to
the seda queue.
For example if processing the messages happens much later, and the
http connection has been closed, and the input stream is closed and
returns no data.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Andreas Feldmann
wrote
I see something strange here.
If I have the below to routes, the logginf works perfectly.
${file:path}
${file:name}
ltel2
Hi
Just marshal the routes to XML *before* you add new routes dynamic.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Nicolas Gapaillard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your answer,
>
> I'm not sure it is really adapted to my problem.
>
> Because I need to export automatically, not manually. I want that my ca
Hi,
Thank you for your answer,
I'm not sure it is really adapted to my problem.
Because I need to export automatically, not manually. I want that my camel
server has always the last routes. For example, if my camel server crashes,
I want to keep all the routes created before the crashe.
Or mayb
Put the outside the .
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:56 PM, ebinsingh
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to set few header's, but does not seem to work.
> I guess I am missing something but not able to find that out.
> The below logs age not printted in the log file.
>
>
>
> headerNa
Hi All,
I am trying to set few header's, but does not seem to work.
I guess I am missing something but not able to find that out.
The below logs age not printted in the log file.
${file:path}
${file:name}
ltel2
It may be a matter of personal taste, but I disagree with reliance on
start levels. It should be more reliable to use a BundleListener to
track whether a particular bundle has loaded, or a ServiceTracker with
the bundle being watched for launching a "here I am" service when
initialization is compl
Hi,
My previous conclusion was not correct.
The Camel initialization happens indeed in the "addingBundle" method, but is
called from a SynchronousBundleListener, in the same thread that activates
the bundle, and there is only one thread ("FelixStartlevel") that activates
all feature bundles, so it
Babak,
Yes my broker have a active mq:
from("activemq:analisarColeta1:analisarColeta").to("seda:analisarColeta?concurrentConsumers="
+ execucoesSimultaneas);
I finally fix the problem!
The class ResourceProperties in client side, I forgot the implements
Serializable. =[
When I done this the pr
Hi,
somehow I still don't get it!
Your routing logic does consume using the Seda endpoint however your client
logic where you produce and send an exchange uses the ActiveMQ component
[1]! So that I can't correlate these two code snippets to each other.
Another question: the Executor you make use
Did you get a response to this? The example you propose is so commonplace
when doing system integration without HTTP; just raw sockets... That I
cannot imagine that it's going to be this hard to get a sample.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Asynchronous-Netty-Se
Hi
Yeah can export the routes as XML, and then load them upon restart.
A little example to load the routes
http://camel.apache.org/loading-routes-from-xml-files.html
Then to save them is also fairly easy.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Nicolas Gapaillard
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is is somethin
Hello:
My Broker receive a message and generate a list of Objects:
from("seda:analisarColeta?concurrentConsumers=" +
execucoesSimultaneas).process(new Processor() {
public void process(Exchange exchange) throws Exception {
AnalisarColetaReq req = (AnalisarColetaReq)
e
Hi,
Could you be please more precise about the problem you're facing? Is the
line:
exchange.getOut().setBody();
part of your *own* implemented Producer logic? If not which Camel component
do you make use of?
And along the 2 lines:
List response = new ArrayList();
response = (List) exchange.ge
Hi all,
Is is something in camel that permits to persist the routes created
dynamically in bdd or an xml file ?
Because for now, I have an application that permits to instanciate new
routes inside camel via the RoutesBuilder. It works very well. But if camel
is restarted, I lose all my already de
Hello,
When I send one ArrayList with a size about 150 in :
exchange.getOut().setBody();
My app(client) stuck and don`t receive the message:
Producer producer = endpoint.createProducer();
producer.start();
producer.process(exchange);
producer.stop();
Li
I have a similar problem. (.GenericFileOnCompletion)
[ad #0 - ftp://localhost/origen] GenericFileOnCompletionERROR Caused
by: [org.apache.camel.component.file.GenericFileOperationFailedException -
File operation failed: Software caused connection abort: socket write
error. Code: 250]
In
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Hartmut Lang
wrote:
> Ok,
>
> maybe it's a good idea to add this to the documentation for file2, "Sorting
> using sortBy" section.
>
Added a note to the maxMessagesPorPoll option, as its the one which
causes this limitation.
> Thanks,
> Hartmut Lang
>
> -O
Ok,
maybe it's a good idea to add this to the documentation for file2, "Sorting
using sortBy" section.
Thanks,
Hartmut Lang
-Original Message-
From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2012 12:02
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Howto use ma
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Hartmut Lang
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what i see from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-2899 is that
> maxMessagesPerPoll and sortBy option do not work well together for a
> FileConsumer endpoint.
>
> In our use-case we have several thousand files in a from("f
Hi,
what i see from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-2899 is that
maxMessagesPerPoll and sortBy option do not work well together for a
FileConsumer endpoint.
In our use-case we have several thousand files in a from("file:...") route. And
every minute we want to process one file sort
Hallo everbody,
currently I am using JUnit-tests for testing purposes.
In my project I have a route with a software-proxy (Jetty) and then some
webservices. That part is working very well. The software-proxy/webservices
respond with the according messages, when I use SOAP-UI.
Now I tried to cons
FYI, I opened CAMEL-4919
-
http://developpef.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Testing-headers-in-multiple-messages-tp5157167p5157294.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thank you for this hint. I will open a JIRA for this.
Yes I think that this point might be comparable to
expectedBodiesReceivedInAnyOrder.
I will try your solution, but I would prefer not to modify the "prodution
ready" route, even if it's not an important change.
-
http://developpef.blogspot
Hello,
simple quesiton : is it possible to use Spagic to monitor Camel components ?
Regards
J-M
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/spagic-and-Camel-tp5157280p5157280.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi
So you mock endpoint receives 3 messages in any order.
And you just want to test that those 3 messages has all together those
3 different headers?
We got that on the body, where you can say expectedBodiesReceivedInAnyOrder
We may consider a similar for the headers.
You can configure the fil
Thanks a lot. My eclipse complained about the missing schema.
I added your suggested jar by:
org.apache.camel
camel-cxf-transport
${camel-version}
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Missing-schema-file-in-a-cookbook-article-tp5128466p5157243.html
Sent from the
If you cant wait for the new mina component you will have to write your own
camel component to do this - at least that is what I ended up doing!
Im new to camel so what I did cannot have the best implementation strategy,
so I will probably replace with the mentioned mina2 component. However a
brief
I recently saw the jira CAMEL-4159 but it is not what I expected : this issue
is intended to let a test expect for multiple headers in ONE message.
What I needed is the following : I know that a given endpoint will receive 3
messages in any order, and I need to test ONE header in each of these
mess
Although CXF 2.5.1 is built with JDK 1.5, as the Camel 2.9 is moved to
JDK 1.6.
You'd better use JDK 1.6 to run your application.
On Thu Jan 19 11:27:54 2012, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
You got both some CXF 2.4 and 2.5 files on the classpath.
And it seems like a JDK 5 and 6 issues as well. Make su
63 matches
Mail list logo
