Hi
See this FAQ
http://camel.apache.org/how-can-i-stop-a-route-from-a-route.html
You can use onException to catch those severe exceptions, and then
trigger the route to stop.
Alternatively you can use a route policy, and have it stop/suspend the
route, in case of a severe exception
http://camel
Hi.
The process of reading a lot of files in a directory. The content of files
stored in the database.
The database server generates an error ORA-00257: archiver error. Connect
internal only, until freed.
It is necessary to correct an error on the database server. It makes no
sense to continue proc
"Camel 2.10: Ant style filter exclusion." right there in front of me ... how
did I miss that?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/antInclude-parameter-tp5443591p5443627.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Its a *new* option in the upcoming Camel 2.10 release.
So its not available in any of the current Camel releases.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:28 AM, icemanltd wrote:
> Is "antInclude" parameter of file uri supported? I thought I had followed the
> documentation but when I deploy I get FailedToCrea
Is "antInclude" parameter of file uri supported? I thought I had followed the
documentation but when I deploy I get FailedToCreateRouteException which
ultimately points to Unknown parameters=[{antInclude=landing/*.txt}].
The XML for this looks like
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.
The Apache Camel project [1] is a powerful open source integration framework
based on known Enterprise Integration Patterns [2].
The Camel PMC just issued a new patch release: Apache Camel 2.8.4.
This release includes almost 90 bug fixes and comes about eight weeks after the
previous patch rel
I'd characterize it as "ServiceMix 4 is a distribution of a number of other
technologies, based on Karaf as it's OSGi framework and using Camel for EIP.
One of those 'other technologies' is an instance of ActiveMQ for JMS
implementation."
The point is that a functionally identical installation
Hello,
I'm just a little confused explaining how all these frameworks fit together.
/My understanding is:/
ServiceMix is ESB that used Karaf as its OSGi Framework(with Felix/Equinox)
and used Camel for routing messages. Its preferred JMS implementation being
ActiveMQ.
Am I missing something here?
Is there a currently implemented way in Camel to apply a custom naming
strategy to Jackson (such as LowerCaseWithUnderscoresStrategy
http://jackson.codehaus.org/1.9.4/javadoc/org/codehaus/jackson/map/PropertyNamingStrategy.LowerCaseWithUnderscoresStrategy.html)?
Or will this only be possible when
Am 30.01.2012 um 17:48 schrieb atg roxx :
> Hi Babak,
>
>
> I cant provide the logs in debug mode but assure you that
> SoapFaultClientException is getting generated.
>
But that makes it difficult for me to help however maybe others on the forum
have got an idea about this behaviour.
Babak
Hi Babak,
I cant provide the logs in debug mode but assure you that
SoapFaultClientException is getting generated.
and yes
-
the above is the copy paste issue;
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Babak Vahdat
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can you turn the log level to DEBUG and send it *
Hi
Can you turn the log level to DEBUG and send it *including* the place where,
as you said, you make sure that a SoapFaultClientException is thrown?
BTW I see STARS around your "ActiveMQComponent" spring bean declaration of
yours:
Is that just as Copy & Paste issue?
Babak
--
View this messa
Any replies ???
I am stuck on this for last couple of days ... any help ??
--cheers,
atgroxx
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 6:32 PM, atg roxx wrote:
> first thanks for replying ...
>
> Now I am using apache-camel-2.8.3 and
>
> route configuration is
> =
>
> @Override
> public void co
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Hervé BARRAULT
wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for the quick answer.
>
>> It does not support batching, not async TX, etc.
>
> But does it supports TX and concurrentConsumers ?
>
> I have to multiply the number of consumers as they are slower than the
> producer.
>
Yes.
Hi,
thanks for the quick answer.
> It does not support batching, not async TX, etc.
But does it supports TX and concurrentConsumers ?
I have to multiply the number of consumers as they are slower than the producer.
On 1/30/12, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Hervé BARRA
Hi
I don't know much about CXF however I intend to understand how it worked at
all *without* any explicit type conversion as I've already recommended by
this thread.
The CxfProducer is invoked in the PAYLOAD mode, that's (if I'm not wrong)
the Body of the Out Message populated into the Camel Excha
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:32 PM, andlu702 wrote:
> Hi
> I have a situation where I am to replace a legacy server which has multiple
> clients and the communication is with a custom raw-byte format over TCP.
> I was thinking that camel MINA must be perfect for the task and have written
> a codec to
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Hervé BARRAULT
wrote:
> Hi, thanks for confirmation.
> So for publication, i should use a transactions with sequential mechanism.
>
> I have seen also on activeMQ documentation :
> http://activemq.apache.org/should-i-use-transactions.html :
> Its also worth noting
Hi
See this FAQ
http://camel.apache.org/using-getin-or-getout-methods-on-exchange.html
In the future we most likely should remove the setOutXXX in the DSL as
they are not usable and adds to the confusion.
People should generally just use setBody / setHeader / transform, and
the Camel DSL figures
Hi,
setOutHeader doesn't copy the message body, you'd better use the
setHeader to that kind of job.
On Mon Jan 30 20:59:18 2012, marnold wrote:
I played around with custom TypeConverters with no luck. I couldn't
understand the messageConverter documentation and wanted to avoid all things
Spr
I played around with custom TypeConverters with no luck. I couldn't
understand the messageConverter documentation and wanted to avoid all things
Spring.
On a whim I removed the and found I was right in that the
payload is automatically converted to the JMS message body. For some reason
the pres
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:15 PM, ckiran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is the Camel File Component thread safe, can I use file component on the
> server to append to a file, based on requests it recieves.
>
Yes if you use a fairly new version of Camel.
We fixed that like 1 year ago or thereabouts (appending to
Hi,
Is the Camel File Component thread safe, can I use file component on the
server to append to a file, based on requests it recieves.
-KC
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-File-Component-tp5441269p5441269.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list arc
Hi,
i have seen two different components in the documentation which are :
- Cache (http://camel.apache.org/cache.html) based on EHcache
- Hazelcast (http://camel.apache.org/hazelcast-component.html)
What are the differences between these components ?
It seems both allows distribution, transacti
Hi, thanks a lot! That definitely was very helpful.
However, if I use the concurrentConsumers option, I guess it means that I'll
have separate JMS consumers with their own separate prefetch buffers.
Would it be possible to control the options like prefetch buffers, consumer
priority etc (the Acti
Hi Andre
Actually the determinedAlphabet isn't set based on the dataCoding,
it's determined isGsm0338Encodeable().
Please check your URI to be sure you've set the correct alphabet, one
of those enums, or leave it to default.
dataCoding is a different option in the URI, set that to 255.
Taariq
Hi
For parallel processing, use the concurrentConsumers |
maxConcurrentConsumers on the JMS endpoint. That is better.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Sabin Timalsena
wrote:
> Well, I wanted to include SEDA for the parallel processing of messages.
> Maybe I should be trying something else? Lik
Well, I wanted to include SEDA for the parallel processing of messages.
Maybe I should be trying something else? Like the Threads DSL maybe. I
haven't taken a good look at the Threads DSL though. What would you
recommend? My scenario basically is like this:
- Messages arrive in an ActiveMQ queue
-
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:19 AM, andrer wrote:
> You would think so, but the SMPP 3.4 spec isn't limited to just those 4
> values when it comes to datacoding.
>
If so feel free to create a JIRA ticket.
Patches is of course welcome, we love contributions
http://camel.apache.org/contributing.html
You would think so, but the SMPP 3.4 spec isn't limited to just those 4
values when it comes to datacoding.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Datacoding-Alphabet-issue-in-SMPP-tp5281005p5440992.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
So, is there any news on this issues?
Is there any complete working examples of using Futures with Camel Proxy?
The examples at http://camel.apache.org/using-camelproxy.html actually shows
half of it. What does the implementation look like?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5
Hi, thanks for confirmation.
So for publication, i should use a transactions with sequential mechanism.
I have seen also on activeMQ documentation :
http://activemq.apache.org/should-i-use-transactions.html :
Its also worth noting that if you are using persistent messaging, the
fastest way of usin
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Sabin Timalsena
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes, I tried setting blockWhenFull=true. However it seems that the caller
> blocks AFTER de-queuing the message from the activeMQ queue. So, if the size
> of the seda queue is 4, then I'm having 5 messages being dequeued, the fifth
Hi
Yes, I tried setting blockWhenFull=true. However it seems that the caller
blocks AFTER de-queuing the message from the activeMQ queue. So, if the size
of the seda queue is 4, then I'm having 5 messages being dequeued, the fifth
one probably waiting to get into the seda queue, and might have to
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:43 AM, andrer wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Taariq.
>
> If I try any other value I get an IllegalArgumentException with "No enum
> const Alphabet with value ...". This is thrown by the jsmpp Alphabet enum
> that also only caters for datacodings of 0, 4 and 8.
>
> In the S
Hi
Check the seda documentation.
http://camel.apache.org/seda
There is a blockWhenFull option you can use to set true to have the
caller block if the seda queue is full
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Sabin Timalsena
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I'm a beginner in camel and ActiveMQ and was recent
Hi Claus,
Thanks for your quick response.
As you suggested we are working with chunks of size 1. The problem is that
with this approach we can´t "play" with the chunk size in order to find a
good balance between memory usage and performance (wich is very critical for
our project).
Thank you.
37 matches
Mail list logo
