Hi Claus,
thanks for your reply.
I'll continue working on mocking the unit tests, since the component requires
currently the underlying R system at build time.
As soon as I'll get that fixed, I can continue with the contribution process.
Happy to keep you posted.
- Christoph
On Jun 1, 2013,
Hi everyone,
The Java DSL is very nice, but I wonder why endpoint URIs are not typesafe.
Instead of
we could write
Even if it's more verbose, is there a technical reason for not doing this?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Endpoint-URI-typesafety-tp
Hi,
Can you reproduce the problem at your end, generate a thread dump and
upload it here?
It will likely contain valuable information to understand what you've
bumped into.
Regards,
Raúl.
On 31 May 2013 02:06, "WPk" wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I am adding the contents of the camel-contexts.xml, assuming
The exchange could be passed to the bean method, therefore you could store
these values in the header or as exchange-properties.
Something like
class abc extends RouteBuilder {
private string str1 = 'a';
private string str2 = 'b';
.
.
.setHeader("str1", str1)
.setHe