Re: aggregation and completionPredicate

2014-12-06 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi What is your correlation expression? Sounds like you should use an expression that matches the key from the map, eg so you have one group for 1. And another group for 2. Then the aggregate is just to add the bodies into a list. On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Jens Breitenstein wrote: > Hi

Re: How to send text messages to mobiles

2014-12-06 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 06/12/14 19:37, rajeshkelam wrote: > Hi All, > > Very firstly I am new to camel and this concepts, i am from SAP/JAVA > backround...as part of my PoC delivery I have to send a text messages to our > customer on SAP Notifications based. > > I have red some blogs in google about Apache Camel

How to send text messages to mobiles

2014-12-06 Thread rajeshkelam
Hi All, Very firstly I am new to camel and this concepts, i am from SAP/JAVA backround...as part of my PoC delivery I have to send a text messages to our customer on SAP Notifications based. I have red some blogs in google about Apache Camel is best choice, I am looking for some help/guidance to

aggregation and completionPredicate

2014-12-06 Thread Jens Breitenstein
Hi Camel Users! I am struggling with aggregation in general and hopefully you can give me a hint: Basically my message body contains a Map. Now I need to aggregate messages to List> based on a certain map key value. So lets assume we have message 1: map { key = "1", val = "A" } message 2:

Building predicates/routes at runtime

2014-12-06 Thread Behrad
This may not be the correct place to share this, but there's no dedicated akka-camel, or scala-dsl camel community out there, so I ask it here. I want to build my camel CBR when predicates at run-time based on user input: considering my CamelMessage bodies are of case class Book as below case clas

Re: ftp-component: RemoteFile to a classic File

2014-12-06 Thread Claus Ibsen
Yes if you want to download from ftp and save to file its from ftp to file On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Nicolas74 wrote: > Ok, thanks Claus. > > So, the correct way to do this should be the following: > > > Is that correct ? Is there another solution ? > > Thanks for your help, > Best, >