Also not sure if inOut MEP can be used across protocols i.e Request comes in
via HTTP and response out via FILE / JMS etc.
Perhaps someone else can confirm this.
Regards,
-Yogesh
--
View this message in context:
Hello,
I think you can achieve the above by using Content Based Routing
(http://camel.apache.org/content-based-router.html) . The preference for the
endpoint can be set in exchange using a processor and routed effectively
using CBR.
Just a thought! hope this helps!
Regards,
-Yogesh
--
View
Hello Willem,
my bad, my browser was picking up the older version from cache and hence
wasn't reflecting the updated version.
Thank you for the help!
Regards,
-Yogesh
--
View this message in context:
Hello,
I think you can achieve this by using Recipient List
http://camel.apache.org/recipient-list.html . Also perhaps this can help
you on how to achieve it
http://camel.apache.org/how-to-use-a-dynamic-uri-in-to.html.
Regards,
-Yogesh
--
View this message in context:
Hello Claus,
Thank you again for your reply. The code in java works and I can get the
counter metrics values in MetricRegistry.
I am now trying to figure out how can I create a bean in blueprint of
SimpleRegistry which extends type HashMap.
So far, I have this.
bean id=metricsRegistry
Hi,
We need a way of using property placeholders on batch-config attributes.
Can you help me?
Thanks,
Ravinder
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Property-Placeholder-for-batchTimeout-value-in-XML-DSL-tp5763356.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list
Hi
Ah in blueprint its easier just declare a bean with
id=metricsRegistry and its shared, eg.
bean id=metricsRegistry class=com.codahale.metrics.MetricsRegistry/
its the name metricsRegistry that has a special meaning
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:20 AM, vivekt vivek.tha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
Hi
See the documentation
http://camel.apache.org/using-propertyplaceholder.html
At the section: Using property placeholders for any kind of attribute
in the XML DSL
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:20 AM, ralgubelli
ravinder.algube...@valuelabs.net wrote:
Hi,
We need a way of using property