Re: Comparison of Apache Camel and IBM Integration Bus v9.0

2015-05-01 Thread Morgan Hautman
Hello, I think for the most part you did a good job but IMHO I really don't understand how you can make a comparison of both when you say : Since IB9 is a full fledged ESB, it allows developers to deploy their routing and mediation logic onto integration nodes which host integration servers

Re: Camel connects to queue instead of topic when using AMQP 1.0

2015-05-01 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Thanks for sharing your findings. I am updating the docs to include your configuration https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/AMQP On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Mark Kusec mku...@mdacorporation.com wrote: Following up my own question with an answer: I found a solution by

Re: How to create case insensitive URI route with netty4-http?

2015-05-01 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:18 PM, hzariv hza...@ebay.com wrote: You are right. I turn on debug logging and I see what is happening. I have the following producer and consumer endpoints. Camel matches on the Consumer endpoint correctly (case insensitive) but the producer URL is created like:

metadata for components, processors etc

2015-05-01 Thread Tim Dudgeon
Is there any mechanism for specifying metadata that describes what inputs and outputs components, processors ... can consume/produce. I'm thinking of this from the perspective of a GUI builder tool that allows a route to be assembled so for this it's necessary to know which nodes are compatible

Webservice proxy - ActiveMq Deadletter Queue

2015-05-01 Thread jainmcs03
Team, My requirement is as follows, 1) Webservice proxy just want to listen the request and put the message into one(request) queue. 2) From the request queue message has to deliver(auto) to end point. 3) If any case failover(end point unavailable,ect,..) message has to retain into dead letter

Re: metadata for components, processors etc

2015-05-01 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi No the components / endpoints dont provide meta-data what java types and data formats they support. However we may get there in the longer run. There is a JIRA ticket about this idea. And with the recent component doc enhancements we have an instrument to provide the details. So end users can

Re: Comparison of Apache Camel and IBM Integration Bus v9.0

2015-05-01 Thread jamie3
I absolutely agree. I do mention this in my blog post. And if you read my second post I mentioned I will be discussing things such as Camel + Apache Service Mix and other technologies. Also the point of the blog is really to offer people a comparison between both offerings, even though camel is