I am seeing wrong correlation key is set for the first exchange emitted from
aggregate EIP.
In the log below,
Exchange[7F40FFF506AA26C-000D] is aggregating with correlation key:
batch-1, but when this exchange is emitted, the property
CamelAggregatedCorrelationKey is set as
Or take a look at the wire tap pattern:
https://camel.apache.org/components/4.0.x/eips/wireTap-eip.html
Raymond
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 2:05 PM Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> You can also look at using onCompletion
> https://camel.apache.org/manual/oncompletion.html
>
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at
Claus (and others),
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I do not think any of that is harsh,
because it makes perfect logical sense, and it is what I figured. I
thought I would ask, just in case. I apologize if my questions were
annoying, and/or a waste of time. Even though I asked these
Big -1 for Lombok from me.
I fully agree with Andrea and Claus about this. Especially #4 - debugging
problems.
Saving few lines in Java code which would take you a minute to write,
comparing to seconds of lombok annotation is nothing comparing to
maintenance pain over years. Been there, done
Hi
Okay it may sound harsh when I and other long term Camel core team
members say No to X or Y.
However its a very large code base and a project that is ongoing for
decades, currently 16 and half years old.
People come and go, and it's important that everything in Camel can be
picked up and
If the component codebase is java-only, is it permissible to use test
frameworks that use other JVM languages? I am talking about things like
Spock or Kotest.
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 9:21 AM Steve973 wrote:
> Oh, regarding my other question, which might have gotten lost among the
> bigger
Oh, regarding my other question, which might have gotten lost among the
bigger discussion about Lombok: is the camel component codebase java-only,
or is Kotlin also ok?
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 9:20 AM Steve973 wrote:
> Thanks, Andra, for the informative reply. I understand and appreciate
>
Thanks, Andra, for the informative reply. I understand and appreciate your
assessment, and it seems like the correct decision for Apache Camel, given
your reasoning. That clears a lot of things up for me. My questions are
only out of curiosity, so I hope this discussion is reasonable and
Last but not least, there are no clear, IMO, advantages is using it,
despite the fact you'll see less boilerplate code. This laziness is
something I don't understand. IDEs will generate setters/getters for you
just with a shortcut on classes with thousands of fields.
Il giorno dom 19 nov 2023
Hello,
Let me add also add a couple of points:
1. It's true that is just a compile dependency but when you decide to use
lombok, you also decide that everyone else who deals with your code will
have to use lombok. Lombok is special in that it is a build-time dependency
and your IDE needs plugins
Does that preference extend to compile-time only, as well? The scope of
lombok is always set to "provided", so it is never included at runtime. I
am also curious if any components can be written in other JVM languages,
such as Kotlin (since camel includes the Kotlin DSL), or if it's java-only.
Hi
No lombok is not allowed - we have as minimal dependency as possible.
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 2:06 PM Steve973 wrote:
> Hello. I completely understand the perspective of limiting the addition of
> libraries for various reasons, and especially when the library is included
> in the
Hello. I completely understand the perspective of limiting the addition of
libraries for various reasons, and especially when the library is included
in the distribution. I know that I have asked about Lombok before, but it
is great for eliminating a lot of boilerplate code, especially when a
Hi
You can also look at using onCompletion
https://camel.apache.org/manual/oncompletion.html
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 8:36 PM Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would also add that HTTP servers like Tomcat, Jetty, JBoss etc have an
> access log that logs how long time each request takes. And they
Hi
I am adding a function to simple language so this can be done via simple in
the future
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-20127
At first its a bit long in the tooth
${messageAs(org.apache.camel.language.simple.MyAttachmentMessage).hasAttachments}
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 12:55 PM
Thanks, Claus. That is good to know.
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 6:54 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have migration guides so it's fine to add in the docs that end users
> need to migrate.
> Also since its isolated to a single component then most users is not
> affected in any way.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Hi
You can look in the source of camel-attachments and see how they are
stored and then do it by checking for exchange property
key CamelAttachmentObjects exists and is not empty
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 9:21 PM ski n wrote:
> As a workaround, I implemented it as follows:
>
> public class
Hi
We have migration guides so it's fine to add in the docs that end users
need to migrate.
Also since its isolated to a single component then most users is not
affected in any way.
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 12:50 PM Steve973 wrote:
> Hello. In a component, if I want to change the format of
Hello. In a component, if I want to change the format of a URI, and still
want to retain compatibility with the previous URI format, is there a way
(within the module) to redirect to the new URI after translation? I want
to split some functionality off to another endpoint. So, rather than
19 matches
Mail list logo
