On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
> I think it should be a best practice to copy the inMessage header if return
> a list of new created Messages within the split method.
That may be, but how is it that /not/ doing this results in errors in
the File component?
I've discovered strange behavior (at least to me) when using a file
consumer connected to a POJO splitter. Here's my route:
from("file:input").
split().method("fileSplitter", "split").
to("mock:out")
If my POJO returns a list of newly created messages (via "new
DefaultMessage(
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Norman Maurer
wrote:
> just read my last comments ..
>
> http://old.nabble.com/Activemq-component-und-Delayer-ts27784918.html
>
> I think the selector is the way to go.
I did, but I didn't see how selectors were any different from a Camel
filter (the unintended ci
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> John says at this thread
> http://old.nabble.com/Activemq-component-und-Delayer-ts27784918.html
>
> That this questions is answered.
But as the other person in that thread said, now we just have to wait
for ActiveMQ 5.4.
Reading through that t
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> For example it appears as you can ask the producers to schedule delivery
> http://activemq.apache.org/delay-and-schedule-message-delivery.html
Claus, you may have answered the question on polling consumers that I
just posted a minute ago. Thos
Hi all, a quick question about writing a polling consumer. Is it
possible to write a polling consumer with the Java DSL which polls a,
queue periodically? Ideally I'd like to have the "delay" and
"initialDelay" parameters of the File component, something like this:
from("activemq:deferred?ini
