Hi all, Despite the fact this subject is really interesting, could you please notice that you are on the USERS' mailing-list and not the DEVS' one ?
Best regards, Thierry 2015-09-04 16:59 GMT+02:00 Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>: > The way I read it is comdev are doing a mass migration to SF - its > understandable they wouldn’t want multiple targets - so to pick one > destination for the code move makes sense. However its not clear that we > have to keep camel-extra at SF - or why we couldn’t just move it to GitHub > ourselves ? > > > > On 4 Sep 2015, at 15:54, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Victor and David: You are welcome to join the com-dev mailing list and > > enlighten them. > > Here is a link the latest answer on that question :-) > > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201507.mbox/%3CBY2PR03MB490B6943E12F5D925203A2E99900%40BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E > > > > // Pontus > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 16:01 David Karlsen <davidkarl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Why not github? > >> 4. sep. 2015 3:54 p.m. skrev "Victor NOËL" <victor.n...@linagora.com>: > >> > >>> Are they even aware of the problem with sourceforge? > >>> Maybe someone that is known there (such as a member of an Apache > Project > >>> ;) could tell them before they take the wrong decision? > >>> > >>> It's even worse than what I thought because after the Gimp people told > SF > >>> to stop doing their shady things, they actually insisted during 2015: > >>> > >> > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00097.html > >>> > >> > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00098.html > >>> > >>> Victor > >>> > >>> Le 04/09/2015 15:36, Raul Kripalani a écrit : > >>> > >>>> Quite frankly, SF would be my last resort. But the Apache Extras > >>>> repositories are governed by the ASF and the consensus seems to point > to > >>>> SF > >>>> rather than Github (which would have been my personal preference) or > >>>> Bitbucket. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> *Raúl Kripalani* > >>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open > Source > >>>> Integration specialist > >>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > >>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Victor NOËL <victor.n...@linagora.com > > > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I arrive a bit late, but are we sure sourceforge is a good solution? > >>>>> > >>>>> After all the fuss about their terrible behaviour by implanting > adware > >>>>> and > >>>>> other spyware in installers available to download there. > >>>>> It became known with the big complain of the Gimp project (that > wasn't > >>>>> even fixed by SourceForge…). > >>>>> > >>>>> See > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_over_dodgy_ads_and_installer/ > >>>>> for details. > >>>>> > >>>>> Victor > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Le 04/09/2015 13:29, Pontus Ullgren a écrit : > >>>>> > >>>>> Do we not already have volunteers in the current set of contributors > >> for > >>>>>> the project ? > >>>>>> I for one is willing in continue maintaining the project once it has > >>>>>> been > >>>>>> moved (where ever it is moved). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think the question right now is the progress of the SF migration. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> // Pontus > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 09:18 Henryk Konsek <hekon...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> As far as I know the Apache Extras projects are being moved to > the... > >>>>>>> SourceForge. So we need to find a volunteer willing to maintain the > >>>>>>> project > >>>>>>> after SourceForge migration. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cheers! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> czw., 3.09.2015 o 20:38 użytkownik Pontus Ullgren < > ullg...@gmail.com > >>> > >>>>>>> napisał: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Have not seen any other updates on the comdev mailing list no. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in > >>>>>>>> charge > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> the move) to get a status update for camel-extra. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> // Pontus > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hey guys, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Do we have an update on the ASF front about the Apache Extras > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> migration? > >>>>>>>> Users are asking for new releases of camel-extras components... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I quickly went through the ComDev thread but found no conclusion. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Maybe I > >>>>>>>> overlooked an email in that thread. Things tend to get very chatty > >>>>>>>> over > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> there and there's no clearly marked conclusion email. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani* > >>>>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open > >>>>>>>>> Source > >>>>>>>>> Integration specialist > >>>>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > >>>>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Pontus Ullgren < > ullg...@gmail.com > >>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> From this thread[1] it seems that Daniel Gruno is the one in > >> charge > >>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>> the move. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> However I fail to find any indication on the progress or > roadmap. > >>>>>>>>>> Using Github as a backup plan does NOT[2] seem to be a option in > >> the > >>>>>>>>>> opinion of the community-dev decision. > >>>>>>>>>> Anyway perhaps we should move this discussion to the camel-dev > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> mailinglist. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3C559EC097.7000707%40apache.org%3E > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3cby2pr03mb490b6943e12f5d925203a2e99...@by2pr03mb490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> // Pontus > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 07:17 Christoph Emmersberger < > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> cemme...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Is there any date when this move is expected? We have still the > >>>>>>>>>> backup > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> plan > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> with Github in place, ... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Pontus Ullgren < > >> ullg...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Diging through the community development list shows that it will > >>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> moved > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> to sourceforge along with the rest of the apache extra. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/browser > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:12 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Yes this has been discussed on the dev list[1][2] and the > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Apache > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> community > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> development mailing list [2]. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any conclusion on this > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion > >>>>>>>>>>>> yet. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Moving-camel-extra-to-github-tt5764066.html > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-camel-extra-moves-forward-tt5765822.html > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [3] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-community > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 18:53 Tim Dudgeon < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> tdudgeon...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Now that the Google code site is about to switch to read only > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wondered > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> what is going to happen to the Camel Extras stuff? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tim > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Henryk Konsek > >>>>>>> http://about.me/hekonsek > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et > >> supportée > >>>>> par Linagora. > >>>>> Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise. > >>>>> http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> > >>> Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et > supportée > >>> par Linagora. > >>> Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise. > >>> http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com > >>> > >> > >
