t;reconnectOnException=true|false" property? Or even a
"reconnectAfterIterations=nnn" or "maxConnectionLifeSeconds=nnn" property
that would force the connection to be closed and reestablished after some
number of iterations or seconds.
What do you think?
-
Dan Checko
g.com/ibsen/
>
>
> --
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/aggregate-split-with-JMS-possible-tp4375238p4376215.html
> To unsubscribe from aggregate + split with J
Is it possible to use aggregate and split with ActiveMQ/JMS? What I'm
interested in doing is a very simple aggregation, the goal being to reduce
the sheer # of JMS messages that ActiveMQ has to deal with. "Bundling" N
messages together is likely to speed up the throughput in my particular
case.
The other day I upgraded my setup to 2.5.0 and started having an issue on
tomcat startup -- multiple webapps all having . I see that that issue has already been fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-3324
Thank you for fixing this. My question is...will there be a 2.5.1 at some
You bet. http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2152
I'll see about trying to add a standalone unit test...
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> Could you create a JIRA ticket and attach your patch.
> And if you have any kind of unit test that can verify this that would
> be great as well.
>
--
ied instance, but also
the original Message instance, so that MailConsumer.processCommit could
setFlag on the original. Otherwise, the message never got marked read.
Attached is a patch for camel/trunk that works.
http://old.nabble.com/file/p26266245/dcheckoway-charset-fix.diff
dcheckoway-charset-fix
> Did you try with this code and did it work for you?
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:50 AM, dcheckoway wrote:
>>
>> Claus, I'm not a contributor on the Camel project, but here's what I
>> would
>> advocate trying in MailBinding.java, expanding the
quot; + message, e);
}
}
}
What do you think?
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:24 PM, dcheckoway wrote:
>>
>> Is there any way to "intercept" the raw mail message content before it
>> gets
>> passed to the jav
Is there any way to "intercept" the raw mail message content before it gets
passed to the java mail API? I would be happy to manually munge the
Content-Type header if I detect one of the known-to-be-funky charsets in
there.
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:5
ch in the route builder? I'm painfully amateur at error
handling with camel...sorry... :-)
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Can you try with 2.1-SNAPSHOT as we have messed with the camel-mail
> component since it was released in 2.0.0.
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:1
983
message-ansi_x3.110-1983
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:53 PM, dcheckoway wrote:
>>
>> Claus,
>>
>> Thanks for the reply. It is a valid charset name, but java6 has no
>> knowledge of it (yet). For example, on my linux box, it lives in
Claus,
Thanks for the reply. It is a valid charset name, but java6 has no
knowledge of it (yet). For example, on my linux box, it lives in
/usr/share/i18n/charmaps/ANSI_X3.110-1983.gz right alongside all the other
typical charsets.
The mail server is whatever google uses...imap.gmail.com is th
I'm using Camel Mail to route email messages to a handler. Works
perfectly...but I've bumped into an issue whenever somebody sends an email
with an unsupported charset. For example:
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ansi_x3.110-1983
...and since JDK6 has no idea wtf charset that is, I get
I finally got it t work as expected, but here was the deal...
If I removed the "transacted=true" from the activemq component's jmsConfig
(or set it to false), then it works as expected. Messages are queued as
they are "sent".
But maybe somebody can
FYI, I tried setting transacted=false in the URI for the endpoint where the
transacted consumer ends up sending subsequent messages. No change in
behavior...it still waits for the consumer to return before anything
actually shows up in the queue.
Any suggestions on how to force a new/separate tr
gt;
> What does your route look like?
>
> Just a quick idea. Maybe in the producer template sendBody you could
> use a JMS endpoint where you set transacted=false.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:43 PM, dcheckoway wrote:
>>
>> Camel 1.6.1, ActiveMQ 5.2.0, Spring 2.5.6
&
Camel 1.6.1, ActiveMQ 5.2.0, Spring 2.5.6
I have a POJO consumer that gets invoked by Camel for messages on an
ActiveMQ JMS queue. It's set up as transacted (JMS transaction manager).
While my POJO is consuming a message, it needs to send a subsequent message
(or several messages) to a differen
Help!
I have a transactional consumer invoked by Camel for messages on
"testQueueA" -- it ends up producing/sending thousands of messages to the
JMS queue "testQueueB". Depending upon how many messages need to be sent,
this scenario hangs. This happens when talking to ActiveMQ via TCP.
I wrote
18 matches
Mail list logo
