I will try to bump this question just once. Any hints from anybody?
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
DCV Chile
-Original Message-
From: gonzalo diethelm [mailto:gdieth...@dcv.cl]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:56 PM
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: Camel, websockets and Javascript
should explore a different way?
Perhaps I need to write the server-side code as a Java app that has both Jetty
(as web server) and Camel (as EAI infrastructure, including its own copy of
Jetty) embedded into it?
Thanks in advance and best regards,
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
DCV Chile
.
--
DCV
Gonzalo Diethelm
Gerente Desarrollo de Sistemas / CDO
Apoquindo 4001 piso 12, Santiago, Chile
+56 2 393-9073
gdieth...@dcv.cl / www.dcv.cl
-Original Message-
From: gonzalo diethelm [mailto:gdieth...@dcv.cl]
Sent: Monday, 16 May, 2011 18:46
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: RE
.
In the future, I might have a need to support SOAP-based web services as well.
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
, what type
of endpoint would that be (servlet, jetty, restlet, etc.) and how would it be
wired to the Java POJO?
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
definition to a Spring MVC implementation of the business logic?
If I am talking nonsense, apologies in advance.
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
been created for these purposes.
If I am talking nonsense, apologies in advance.
Ditto.
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
at it as a black box, but I can see the operations guys slowly
loosing their minds managing the beast...
Hope this helps - significantly to coax contributions from some of the
guys on here. They seem pretty good to me
It helps a lot, thanks again.
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
compared to start a Main class). Try it out.
I definitely will. Thanks for clarifying this for me; this area is where my
expertise is the least (close to zero), and to my newbie eyes OSGi seems too
good to be true.
Best regards - Claus
Thanks again.
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
from Spring, and hopefully avoid (for
now) ServiceMix, since it seems pure Camel will cover all my needs. Does this
make sense to you?
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
?
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
nice thread, thanks for the sharing... to me, multiple instances makes
sense
for fail-over. Just configure it through the ActiveMQ...
That too.
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
good to be true.
I'm not sure if your services have a good granularity to deploy each of
them as a single application in an OSGi container, because there is some
little overhead to make them ready for OSGi.
I guess some testing (on my part) is called for.
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
-restlet.html
I think this is the key to remove these warnings.
I am not sure what to make out of that page. I tried adding the following in
several parts of my route, but the warnings still appear:
removeHeader headerName=User-Agent/
Any other suggestions?
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
my point of view I think JEE will be simpler to get running but less
innovative and less open. The apache stack above will be more complex to
setup but provide more flexibility. So it will be a tradeoff like always
in architecture.
Totally agree. Thanks for the high-level view.
--
Gonzalo
would be needed; I guess my mind has become a
little brittle, after all these years of pure J(2)EE. Let's get the ball
rolling with this information and I will provide more if required.
Thanks in advance for any wisdom shared, and best regards.
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
16 matches
Mail list logo
