I'm not sure what you mean by creating a sample project. I'm not really a
developer. I'm a product manager.
I think that the specification of replyTo on an endpoint should always
ensure that there is a replyTo specified in messages sent by the
JMSProducer, because if the route creator specifies
I've been reading through the source for the JmsProducer class and don't see
how this can ever work for InOnly. It seems that the code is looking at the
inMessage in the Exchange for a ReplyTo header, and not checking the
endpoint definition to see if it's forcing the ReplyTo in the endpoint
defi
Thanks for the quick reply. Yes I'm using AMQ 5.4.1. When you say fixed in
trunk, is this the Camel trunk or the AMQ trunk? I'm using AMQ 5.4.1, but
with Camel 2.5.0.
Ian
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/TransportDisposedIOException-tp3250474p3250540.html
Se
Using a file connector with the following route definition I get a
TransportDisposedIOException whenever I drop a file into the monitored
directory. Oddly enough it seems that this doesn't affect the functionality
of the system.
http://camel.apache.org/schema/web";
xmlns="http://camel.apache.or
I'm trying to setup a fairly simple scenario where I use Camel to pull a
document out of a directory on the file system and send it to a JMS queue.
I have an application that will read the message from the queue and send a
response to the queue specified in the replyTo header of the inbound
messa
