Hi difference between to and wiretap: Wiretap uses a dedicated thread pool to process the messages. So you have to be careful about transaction boundaries.
Regards Stephan -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Caranthir [mailto:candelor...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Mai 2017 13:23 An: users@camel.apache.org Betreff: Difference between WireTap and to Hello, I have a problem. In my camel application I have two JPA endpoints. Where I get some values from one database and insert it to the other one. So I defined jpa endpoint for one database and jpa2 for the other database. i get some value with from(jpa://...).process( ... ).to(direct:e) then from(direct:e).process( ... ).to(jpa2:// ...).to(direct:d) then from(direct:d).to(jpa://..) When I do this the last insert to the jpa component doesnt work as expected and tries to insert to jpa2 instead of jpa. I was pretty confused. It took a few days to resolve this issue. When I only changed to value to WireTap, it started working as expected and inserted values to jpa . from(jpa://...).process( ... ).to(direct:e) then from(direct:e).process( ... ).to(jpa2:// ...).wireTap(direct:d) then from(direct:d).to(jpa://..) Is there a difference between to(direct:d) and wireTap(direct:d) that is not clear to me? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Difference-between-WireTap-and-to-tp5801360.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
