Re: Asynchronous Jetty

2012-02-21 Thread Gert Villemos
Yes, that is what I did in the end as well. I then let the 'main' route return a 'Ongoing' message using ''. Initially I considered this a 'hack', but I now start to see this as a quite valid solution. -- View this message in context: http://camel

Re: Asynchronous Jetty

2012-02-21 Thread Claus Ibsen
tion; > >  http://localhost:4242/request?synchronous=false"/> > > But the call is still "hanging" until the route completes. What am I doing > wrong? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Asynchronous-Jetty-tp4

Re: Asynchronous Jetty

2012-02-20 Thread Gert Villemos
g" until the route completes. What am I doing wrong? -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Asynchronous-Jetty-tp474855p5498895.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Asynchronous Jetty

2009-04-27 Thread Roman Kalukiewicz
2009/4/24 Aaron Mulder : > I have a situation where a request comes in to Jetty, and goes through > two other routes and queues before a response is generated that allows > the HTTP response to be sent to the caller.  I'd like to be able to > force Jetty into using continuations so it doesn't park

Asynchronous Jetty

2009-04-24 Thread Aaron Mulder
I have a situation where a request comes in to Jetty, and goes through two other routes and queues before a response is generated that allows the HTTP response to be sent to the caller. I'd like to be able to force Jetty into using continuations so it doesn't park a thread while those other routes