Re: Bean Processor cause WS Security Failure

2011-06-20 Thread Willem Jiang
; >> -original - >> Sender: Willem Jiang [mailto:willem.ji...@gmail.com] >> Date: 2011年6月14日 11:31 >> Receiver: users@camel.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Bean Processor cause WS Security Failure >> >> What's request security header name ? &

Re: Bean Processor cause WS Security Failure

2011-06-13 Thread ext2
original - > Sender: Willem Jiang [mailto:willem.ji...@gmail.com] > Date: 2011年6月14日 11:31 > Receiver: users@camel.apache.org > Subject: Re: Bean Processor cause WS Security Failure > > What's request security header name ? > Maybe we can consider to filter the secur

Re: Bean Processor cause WS Security Failure

2011-06-13 Thread ext2
original - > Sender: Willem Jiang [mailto:willem.ji...@gmail.com] > Date: 2011年6月14日 11:31 > Receiver: users@camel.apache.org > Subject: Re: Bean Processor cause WS Security Failure > > What's request security header name ? > Maybe we can consider to filter the secur

Re: Bean Processor cause WS Security Failure

2011-06-13 Thread Willem Jiang
What's request security header name ? Maybe we can consider to filter the security header of the CXF message in CxfHeaderFilterStrategy. You can configure your own HeaderFilterStrategy by extends the CxfHeaderFilterStrategy. On 6/14/11 10:37 AM, ext2 wrote: Hi: Following is a simpl

Bean Processor cause WS Security Failure

2011-06-13 Thread ext2
Hi: Following is a simple sayHello Webservice implemented by camel. The webservice's request is configured to decrypt by server certificate and response is configured to encrypt by client certificate. If I use a bean as following, every thing is ok