Re: Best Strategy - aggregation

2010-03-02 Thread Andrew Chandler
I just realized I totally misinterpreted your question - the maps you asked about are the ones we appear to be leaking which were intended to be references only however I think what's happening is that they aren't going away when we think they are. I think what is happening is that some of the ro

Re: Best Strategy - aggregation

2010-03-02 Thread Andrew Chandler
The map is an member of the instance of the second splitter - our understanding is that there is one splitter per instance of the route so there really is just the one copy of the map in our circumstance.if the splitter was useful for more than one route of course there would be more than one m

Re: Best Strategy - aggregation

2010-03-02 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Andrew Chandler wrote: > We wound up resolving this by basically totally subverting a secondary > splitter - we split the first time to do the parallel work and then > route to a second custom splitter that maintains an internal map of > result objects - the map is

Re: Best Strategy - aggregation

2010-03-02 Thread Andrew Chandler
We wound up resolving this by basically totally subverting a secondary splitter - we split the first time to do the parallel work and then route to a second custom splitter that maintains an internal map of result objects - the map is based on the correlation key and the object includes properties

Re: Best Strategy - aggregation

2010-03-02 Thread Andrew Chandler
Thanks Clause On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 07:03 +0100, Claus Ibsen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Andrew Chandler wrote: > > When does 2.3 come out - sounds like what I want, just I'm pretty sure > > we can't update to something that isn't released yet or at least very > > close to release >

Re: Best Strategy - aggregation

2010-03-01 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Andrew Chandler wrote: > When does 2.3 come out - sounds like what I want, just I'm pretty sure > we can't update to something that isn't released yet or at least very > close to release > 2.2 was just recently released. I would think 2.3 is a couple of more months

Re: Best Strategy - aggregation

2010-03-01 Thread Andrew Chandler
When does 2.3 come out - sounds like what I want, just I'm pretty sure we can't update to something that isn't released yet or at least very close to release On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 19:51 +0100, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > Try with the new overhauled aggreagtor in 2.3 > http://camel.apache.org/ag

Re: Best Strategy - aggregation

2010-03-01 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Try with the new overhauled aggreagtor in 2.3 http://camel.apache.org/aggregator2.html It works bette with completion trigger. On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Andrew Chandler wrote: > Hi there - with Clause help I've been able to get most of the way to > where I need to be.   Right now I'm

Best Strategy - aggregation

2010-03-01 Thread Andrew Chandler
Hi there - with Clause help I've been able to get most of the way to where I need to be. Right now I'm doing a proof of concept with string payloads,however in the end the payload will be an object. Here's what I'm attempting I have an incoming message that contains an identifier as well as (