Follow up... I discovered that enrich etc. hide property removal but not
property modification. So after switching over to properties, which I think
is better (with the exception that there is no removeProperties in Spring
XML), only split does what I need. ~cg
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014, Camel
Hi Claus,
Indeed, after running a test program, I confirmed that enrich and
recipientList 'hide' changes made to properties but not to headers.
This is not the case, however, for dynamicRouter, which doesn't hide
changes made to headers or properties.
split works for headers in addition to proper
You can store information as exchange properties and they stick around
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Camel Guy wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> Thank you again for your reply. Unfortunately I did not see anything
> in that FAQ that relates to my problem.
>
> From route A, I am invoking route B (serially
Hi Claus,
Thank you again for your reply. Unfortunately I did not see anything
in that FAQ that relates to my problem.
>From route A, I am invoking route B (serially) that deletes a header
key. I would like the header key to exist for route A afterwards even
though route B deleted it. Using a spl
See this FAQ
http://camel.apache.org/why-is-my-message-body-empty.html
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Camel Guy wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> Thanks for the pointer!
>
> This program logs "INFO hello" followed by an empty INFO message. I
> would like the second logged message to also be "INFO hello."
Hi Claus,
Thanks for the pointer!
This program logs "INFO hello" followed by an empty INFO message. I
would like the second logged message to also be "INFO hello."
Am I doing something wrong?
Camel 2.14.0
Thank you,
~cg
hello
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Claus
See about the content enricher
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Camel Guy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Spring XML. I would like to invoke a route synchronously,
> passing the current Exchange. However, I want to discard the changes
> that the invoked route makes to the Exchange (e.g., modificat
Hello,
I am using Spring XML. I would like to invoke a route synchronously,
passing the current Exchange. However, I want to discard the changes
that the invoked route makes to the Exchange (e.g., modification of
headers).
So far this is the shortest recipe that results in the desired behavior:
