I was facing a similar issue and the solution was very useful.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-CXF-Component-with-ActiveMQ-tp474631p5718646.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
If you are using Multicast, please keep in mind the default aggregation
strategy is using the latest exchange. So you need put the bean endpoint
as the last one to endpoint like this.
ther than the out
>>> message I explicity set in the confirmationResponseBean like this:
>>>
>>> exchange.getOut().setBody(returnDoc.getDocumentElement());
>> You have to use a AggregationStrategy to "compute" the response when
>
>> > uri="bean:confirmationResponseBean?method=createConfirmationResponse"
>> />
>>
>>
>>
>> Any ideas? I have tried all different types of solutions and have had no
>> luck.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yogesh
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Camel-CXF-Component-with-ActiveMQ-tp22879705p22879705.html
>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> Apache Camel Committer
>
> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
> Apache Camel Reference Card:
> http://refcardz.dzone.com/refcardz/enterprise-integration
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Camel-CXF-Component-with-ActiveMQ-tp22879705p22885124.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
te you can set on
the multicast node.
>
> If I take activemq out of the equation and have a simple route like this,
> all is fine:
>
> uri="cxf:bean:dropoffSynchronousWebService-endpoint?dataFormat=POJO"
> />
>
> ur
I have tried all different types of solutions and have had no
luck.
Thanks,
Yogesh
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Camel-CXF-Component-with-ActiveMQ-tp22879705p22879705.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
