onfiguration point changes nothing in how the exchange is
>> processed I will assume this is bug resulting in a completely dead and
>> useless configuration point.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com]
nesday, May 06, 2015 11:35 AM
> To: users@camel.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Camel Mail mapMailMessage flag ignored
>
> Hi
>
> Read the description. Its about whether mail message headers and body is
> mapped to Camel Message Body / Headers automatic or lazy-on-demand.
>
>
mapMailMessage flag ignored
Hi
Read the description. Its about whether mail message headers and body is mapped
to Camel Message Body / Headers automatic or lazy-on-demand.
From outside you cant tell the difference unless you work with the low level
message api.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:32 PM
at all.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Mail-mapMailMessage-flag-ignored-tp5766767p5766771.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cib...@red
ext:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Mail-mapMailMessage-flag-ignored-tp5766767p5766771.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
word&peek=true&protocol=imap&searchTerm.unseen=true&unseen=true
>
> Am I just doing something wrong?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Mail-mapMailMessage-flag-ignored-tp5766767.html
> Sent from the Camel
folderName=INBOX&mapMailMessage=false&maxMessagesPerPoll=0&password=password&peek=true&protocol=imap&searchTerm.unseen=true&unseen=true
Am I just doing something wrong?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Mail-mapMailMessage-flag-ignored-tp5766767.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
