A few things, the most important being the ability to use dependencies that
only support 1.6 (e.g. jersey). Even in previous versions released with jdk 1.5
support, some component did not work with jdk 1.5. That complicated our testing
and packaging as well, and required extra time and effort to
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> The cost/benefit ratio seemed to high for us.
What does Camel gain from using JDK 1.6?
On Mar 12, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Grant Rettke wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:30 PM, bfischer wrote:
>> 3. Furthermore our customers are "conservative", they don't like migrations
>> to new versions. Thats true especially for their operating departments
>> because it brings more work, increases
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:30 PM, bfischer wrote:
> 3. Furthermore our customers are "conservative", they don't like migrations
> to new versions. Thats true especially for their operating departments
> because it brings more work, increases risks ...
Customers are very conservative.
Hi Tarun,
even it is sound strange, it has simple reasons:
1. Sun/Oracle JDK/JVM 5 reached its end of life. But they are other vendors
out there like IBM (not sure about the status) and SAP, maybe more.
2. Big vendors like the before mentioned are shipping JVM as part of their
"solutions", usual
Hi,
Why would any commercial environment still use Java 5 for current
development considering it has passed its end of service life (with
all the associated legal ramifications) ?
-Tarun
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:19 PM, bfischer wrote:
> Hi Hadrian, Claus and Willem,
>
> many thanks for your feedback - thinking about I found it's worth to
> continue on the path we started already.
> Means:
>
> 1. Compiling Camel by our own like proposed by Hadrian (but it doesn't seems
> to be tha
Hi Hadrian, Claus and Willem,
many thanks for your feedback - thinking about I found it's worth to
continue on the path we started already.
Means:
1. Compiling Camel by our own like proposed by Hadrian (but it doesn't seems
to be that easy)
2. I'll propose to my management to buy external support
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> First of thanks for using camel and for taking the time to express your
> thoughts. Much appreciated.
>
> Comments inline.
>
> Hadrian
>
> On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:02 AM, bfischer wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Unfortunately I'm on
On 3/10/11 7:02 AM, bfischer wrote:
Hi all,
Unfortunately I'm only subscribed to this list - so I recognized the
announcement on the start page right now. That's my fault - but I like to
follow invitation for a comment at the end of the announcement.
First of all and to say it short - Camel is
Hi Bernd,
First of thanks for using camel and for taking the time to express your
thoughts. Much appreciated.
Comments inline.
Hadrian
On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:02 AM, bfischer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Unfortunately I'm only subscribed to this list - so I recognized the
> announcement on the start
Hi all,
Unfortunately I'm only subscribed to this list - so I recognized the
announcement on the start page right now. That's my fault - but I like to
follow invitation for a comment at the end of the announcement.
First of all and to say it short - Camel is great and sure, developers
decide abou
12 matches
Mail list logo
