for common exception handling, just declare it outside of route definitions
to allow them to be shared by all routes/subroutes.
onException(Exception.class)
.handled(true)
.to("direct:Z");
from("A")...to("B")...to("C");
from("B")...;
from("C")...;
gregoire wrote:
>
> So don't know if all these case are normal behaviour. Maybe my question
> is, what is the best design when using onException. Should I put one on
> all my subroutes (what about case 3 ?), or is it a better design to have
> only one onException in my main route.
>
-----
Ben O'Day
IT Consultant -http://benoday.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Exceptions-thrown-by-sub-routes-and-their-processing-in-main-route-s-onException-tp4291247p4298543.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
