Re: Exchange lifecycle

2013-03-18 Thread Lars-Erik Helander
here is a JIRA somewhere. > >> Reading about UnitOfWork, I understood that the unit of work is bound to an >> exchange within a single route, is there some way to create a unit of work >> that would cover multiple ruotes thar are "connected" to the same "

Re: Exchange lifecycle

2013-03-18 Thread Claus Ibsen
same "exchange" > (e.g. via "direct" or "direct-vm") ? > No the UoW is bound to the exchange lifecycle, and is done when the Exchange is done, (eg when its routing is fully done). > Thanks > > Lars > > > > -- > View this message in

Exchange lifecycle

2013-03-17 Thread helander
es thar are "connected" to the same "exchange" (e.g. via "direct" or "direct-vm") ? Thanks Lars -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Exchange-lifecycle-tp5729310.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Exchange lifecycle

2011-06-22 Thread boday
Exchange could be passed from A - B - C (since they are > independent!). > > Thanks in advance! > - Ben O'Day IT Consultant -http://consulting-notes.com -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Exchange-lifecycle-tp4509898p4515525.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Exchange lifecycle

2011-06-21 Thread colr__
this is the root of my confusion, as if they are independant processes then I dont see how the same Exchange could be passed from A - B - C (since they are independent!). Thanks in advance! -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Exchange-lifecycle-tp4509898p4509898.