2010/5/19 Claus Ibsen :
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Muhammad Ichsan wrote:
>> 2010/5/18 Claus Ibsen :
>>> Try without ?replyTo=out
>>
>
> Do something simpler and then add to the route.
> For example using only JMS, mock etc. to have a simple test starting.
>
> And InOut over JMS works tran
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Muhammad Ichsan wrote:
> 2010/5/18 Claus Ibsen :
>> Try without ?replyTo=out
>
Do something simpler and then add to the route.
For example using only JMS, mock etc. to have a simple test starting.
And InOut over JMS works transparent, so you do not have to send t
2010/5/18 Claus Ibsen :
> Try without ?replyTo=out
Not working
--
~The best men are men who benefit to others
http://michsan.web.id 一緒に勉強しましょう！
Yang berkualitas memang beda rasanya!
http://rizqi-cookies.com
Try without ?replyTo=out
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Muhammad Ichsan wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I have the following routes:
>
> // To test in out pattern
>
> from("direct:input").setExchangePattern(ExchangePattern.InOut).to("activemq:in?replyTo=out").to("mock:res
Dear All
I have the following routes:
// To test in out pattern
from("direct:input").setExchangePattern(ExchangePattern.InOut).to("activemq:in?replyTo=out").to("mock:result");
from("activemq:in").to("bean:con?method=toExternalMessageRequest").to("bean:biller?meth
