rg/polling-consumer.html
Jan
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: souciance [mailto:souciance.eqdam.ras...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. November 2015 23:32
> An: users@camel.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Integration Pattern
>
> A pattern is not FTP-->E-mail
A pattern is not FTP-->E-mail. Its is more abstracted than that.
Why not simply have a route for the FTP, and if the body is not empty, send
it to another route which creates the e-mail and sends it?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Integration-Patt
sword=secret&to=m...@mail.org&subject=Upload-finis
> hed")
> .otherwise()
> .to("scp://scp.host.org/dir?username=me&password=secret")
> ;
>
>
>
> Jan
>
>
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: S
liche Nachricht-
> Von: SteveR [mailto:srichard...@vonage.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 9. November 2015 18:34
> An: users@camel.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Integration Pattern
>
> Hi Ishada:
>
> Maybe checkout the Camel Mail Component
> <http://camel.apache.org/ma
Hi Ishada:
Maybe checkout the Camel Mail Component <http://camel.apache.org/mail.html>
.
SteveR
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Integration-Pattern-tp5773535p5773547.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I am using came in my Integration Project. I am moving files from my local
drive to SFTP server. What I am trying to achieve is once all the files from
my local drive is moved to SFTP Server I should send an email.
Is there any Integration Pattern which would help me to solve it?
--
View this
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/surrogate-key-and-integration-pattern-tp28749325p28749325.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e controlling of method calling is
> happening from the Connector bundle.
> If I see an Camel Integration pattern they will tell some thing like this
> Object Message ->>>>> Validator >>>>> Transformer >>>>
> soapAppender --->>>
controlling of method calling is
happening from the Connector bundle.
If I see an Camel Integration pattern they will tell some thing like this
Object Message ->>>>> Validator >>>>> Transformer >>>>
soapAppender --->>>> callWebserv
ll control.
If the response is approved you can set some header flag with approve,
the Content Based Router can use.
>
> If yes, what EIP would be most appropriate?
>
> regards.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/What-Enterprise-Integration-Pattern-will-s
You could try the message filter:
http://camel.apache.org/message-filter.html
Greetings
Christian
Am 23.01.2010 21:04, schrieb lekkie:
I have a request message I intend to send to an exchange to be processed.
If the response from the exchange is approved, I intend to send the request
message
this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/What-Enterprise-Integration-Pattern-will-solve-this-scenario--tp27289460p27289460.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Camerino
wrote:
Hi,
Does camel implement the smart proxy integration pattern?
There is no specific DSL in Camel that implements the smart proxy.
You should be able to use the existing blocks in Camel to assemble the
smart proxy.
What is your use case?
Thanks
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel
2:37 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Carlo Camerino
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Does camel implement the smart proxy integration pattern?
>
> There is no specific DSL in Camel that implements the smart proxy.
>
> You should be able to use the exi
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Carlo Camerino wrote:
> Hi,
> Does camel implement the smart proxy integration pattern?
There is no specific DSL in Camel that implements the smart proxy.
You should be able to use the existing blocks in Camel to assemble the
smart proxy.
What is your us
Carlo Camerino
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Does camel implement the smart proxy integration pattern?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
http://tahoe.baselogic.com
---
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Carlo Camerino wrote:
> Hi,
> Does camel implement the smart proxy integration pattern?
>
> Thanks
>
Hi,
Does camel implement the smart proxy integration pattern?
Thanks
.
What enterprise integration pattern should I use here? I don't know if I
should use Dynamic Routing Or Load Balancing for this one.
The message could only go to one place at a time. As long as the first one
is up then I would have to go to it. But when it goes down, my application
automati
ound robin for all active listeners and automatically
>>>>>> leave out those that are not alive. Camel has very nice support for jms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In my company we do the complete SOA based on SOAP/JMS instead of
>>>>>> SOAP/HTTP.
&g
>>>
>>>>> In my company we do the complete SOA based on SOAP/JMS instead of
>>>>> SOAP/HTTP.
>>>>> One of the most important reasons for the decision was the above feature
>>>>> of
>>>>> jms.
>
e feature of
>>>> jms.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Carlo Camerino schrieb:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi There,
>>>>> I have a situation in which I n
>>>
>>> Carlo Camerino schrieb:
>>>>
>>>> Hi There,
>>>> I have a situation in which I need to connect to two different hosts. I
>>>> need
>>>> to be able to switch at runtime to a different host when one host goes
>
s
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> Carlo Camerino schrieb:
>>>
>>> Hi There,
>>> I have a situation in which I need to connect to two different hosts. I
>>> need
>>> to be able to switch at runtime to a different host when one ho
d
>> to be able to switch at runtime to a different host when one host goes
>> down.
>> What enterprise integration pattern should I use here? I don't know if I
>> should use Dynamic Routing Or Load Balancing for this one.
>>
>> The message could only go to one pla
. I need
to be able to switch at runtime to a different host when one host goes down.
What enterprise integration pattern should I use here? I don't know if I
should use Dynamic Routing Or Load Balancing for this one.
The message could only go to one place at a time. As long as the first one
> lb.addSlave("zzz");
> lb.setSelection(RoundRobin);
>
> And use .process(lb) in your route.
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Carlo Camerino wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi There,
>>> I have a situation
able to switch at runtime to a different host when one host goes down.
>> What enterprise integration pattern should I use here? I don't know if I
>> should use Dynamic Routing Or Load Balancing for this one.
>> The message could only go to one place at a time. As long as the first
s
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Carlo Camerino wrote:
>> Hi There,
>> I have a situation in which I need to connect to two different hosts. I need
>> to be able to switch at runtime to a different host when one host goes down.
>> What enterprise integrat
Camerino wrote:
>
> Hi There,
> I have a situation in which I need to connect to two different hosts. I need
> to be able to switch at runtime to a different host when one host goes down.
> What enterprise integration pattern should I use here? I don't know if I
> should
Hi There,
I have a situation in which I need to connect to two different hosts. I need
to be able to switch at runtime to a different host when one host goes down.
What enterprise integration pattern should I use here? I don't know if I
should use Dynamic Routing Or Load Balancing for thi
Hi Everyone,
I have this question. I am now gonna do an integration involving MQ and it
is different from the other mq scenarios i've handled before.
Most of what i've handled before involved the request reply pattern which
can easily be done in mq via the correlation id scheme.
In this case, wha
32 matches
Mail list logo
