:39 PM
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: Looking for a transactional solution
WARNING: This message was received from an EXTERNAL EMAIL ADDRESS.
Examine the URL and use caution BEFORE clicking links or opening any
attachments.
Hello Steve,
It seems to work for me, let
Hello Steve,
It seems to work for me, let me know if you want to see a sample
maven project for it. Are you sure that your "jms" component is
configured correctly and has a transactionManager set and has transacted =
true?
The sample project I created has a scheduled route that writ
Hi Brenneis,
Have you ever tried to set "transacted=true" with the incoming queue ? Just
like
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> https://clicktime.symantec.com/3NL8rtk3CaQa9bJreF5FDn7Vc?u=https%3A%2F%2Fcamel.apache.org%2Fcomponents%2F3.4.x%2Feips%2Ftransactional-client.h
Thank you for your answer George.
We are using the XML DSL. When we try something like this:
https://clicktime.symantec.com/3NL8rtk3CaQa9bJreF5FDn7Vc?u=https%3A%2F%2Fcamel.apache.org%2Fcomponents%2F3.4.x%2Feips%2Ftransactional-client.html
For example.
Steve,
The transactional EIP supports crossing multiple routes as long
as each one of those routes are transactionally aware (transaction
demarcation) and your JMS connection factory is configured properly and
set-up to use a transaction manager. I personally use camel under an OSGI
c
I hope this is the right place to ask this question. If not, maybe someone can
direct me to the right place.
I have an application that reads messages from a queue, passes them off to a
content-based router, which then passes them to various validation and
transformation routes. At the end of e
