Re: Problem with Splitter() in Synchronous routes introduced in Camel 2.3

Here are our findings when upgrading beyond Camel 2.2 Here are some interesting observations during the testing of Camel 2.3.0 with synchronous "inOut()" in the route: When using "direct:", no matter what you do, processing will always be synchronous since "direct" is just a continuation of the

Re: Problem with Splitter() in Synchronous routes introduced in Camel 2.3

Hi All, Thanks for all the replies. I lost track of how this relates back to the Splitter() issue. Is there still some debate about whether this is a bug or a feature? ;) Thanks Andrew -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Problem-with-Splitter-in-Synchronous-route

Re: Problem with Splitter() in Synchronous routes introduced in Camel 2.3

You most likely need to tell the splitter to use the UseLatestAggregationStrategy for aggregation if you want it to spit out the last body,. On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:46 PM, ee7arh wrote: > > Hello, > > This was originally posted in default Camel forum but I guess camel-users is > best. > > Sinc

Problem with Splitter() in Synchronous routes introduced in Camel 2.3

Hello, This was originally posted in default Camel forum but I guess camel-users is best. Since we upgraded to anything from Camel 2.3 onwards, our InOut() routes are mis-behaving ;) After some long and painful debugging we realised that the Splitter() pattern is causing the problem. The proble