As of now tokenizer does not evaluate properties/expression, so you have to
pass string value.
I am curious to know if one can refer/access current exchange object while
defining the route. If that is possible then something like this will work in
your case.
from("direct:start").split().tokenize(header("tokenheader").evaluate(exchange,
type) ,2)......
-Ravi
________________________________________
From: Costash [costache_v_v...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 7:07 PM
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: TokenizeXML by value from message header
Hi,
I'm trying to tokenize (by grouping) a body of a message based on a values
from message header. The value from message header differs from one message
to another. But it is not working.
Is this not supported by camel? or should be done in a specific way?
I've tried different ways. ( int groupSize = 10 )
Case1:
.split().tokenizeXML("${headers.myTagHeader}" , groupSize)
Result: Illegal repetition near index 13
<(.{1,15}?:|)${headers.myTagHeader}(\s+.*?|)>
Case2:
.process(new Processor() {
@Override
public void process(Exchange exchange) throws Exception {
exchange.setProperty("myTagHeaderInExchange",
exchange.getIn().getHeader("myTagHeader"));
}
})
.split().tokenizeXML(header("myTagHeaderInExchange").toString() , groupSize)
Result: Illegal repetition near index 18
<(.{1,15}?:|)header{myTagHeaderInExchange}(\s+.*?|)>
Case3:
.setHeader("myTagHeaderInExchange", simple("${headers.myTagHeader}"))
.split().tokenizeXML(header("myTagHeaderInExchange").toString() , groupSize)
Result: Illegal repetition near index 18
<(.{1,15}?:|)header{myTagHeaderInExchange}(\s+.*?|)>
Case4:
public static String myTagHeaderInExchange = "dummy";
.process(new Processor() {
@Override
public void process(Exchange exchange) throws Exception {
EslRouteBuilder.myTagHeaderInExchange = (String)
exchange.getIn().getHeader("myTagHeader");
}
})
.split().tokenizeXML(myTagHeaderInExchange , groupSize)
Result: tokenize by "dummy" instead of value of "myTagHeader" header. Witch
is normal as Anonymous class.
But if instead of the anonymous processor i call an existing processor
class with same code. Still processing after "dummy".
Thanks in advance,
Vlad
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/TokenizeXML-by-value-from-message-header-tp5754589.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient(s), please reply to the sender and
destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email,
and/or any action taken in reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. Where permitted by applicable law, this e-mail
and other e-mail communications sent to and from Cognizant e-mail addresses may
be monitored.
