On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:32 PM, AMARNATH, Balachandar
wrote:
> I am new to camel and trying to run a simple example. I have the following
> classes constitute a simple route which I am not able to run it.
>
> public class CamelStarter {
>
> /**
> * @param args
> */
>
The file endpoint should be a directory and not a file.
Sent from a mobile device
Am 24.01.2013 12:33 schrieb "AMARNATH, Balachandar" <
balachandar.amarn...@airbus.com>:
> I am new to camel and trying to run a simple example. I have the following
> classes constitute a simple route which I am not
7;, at the end, the file is removed from the location. What
is the way to prevent this behaviour?
With regards
Balachandar
-Original Message-
From: Christian Müller [mailto:christian.muel...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 January 2013 01:47
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: issues with simp
@camel.apache.org
Subject: RE: issues with simple example
Hello,
Thanks for the help,
Now, I need to pass a set of strings (say, in a arrayList). This list need to
be processed by the processor code. Now, which endpoint will be suitable to
give this list as an input?
Further, I have observed that
the end, the file is removed from the location.
> What is the way to prevent this behaviour?
>
>
> With regards
> Balachandar
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Müller [mailto:christian.muel...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 25 January 2013 01:47
> To: users@camel.ap
t; With thanks and regards
> Bala
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: AMARNATH, Balachandar [mailto:balachandar.amarn...@airbus.com]
> Sent: 28 January 2013 11:42
> To: users@camel.apache.org
> Subject: RE: issues with simple example
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the help
? If yes, can some one point me to correct resources?
> >
> > With thanks and regards
> > Bala
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: AMARNATH, Balachandar [mailto:balachandar.amarn...@airbus.com]
> > Sen
-
From: Willem jiang [mailto:willem.ji...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 January 2013 08:25
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: issues with simple example
It could be more safe to put the state into the exchange property, as the
message header will be override or lost through the processors.
--
Wi
ge-
> From: Willem jiang [mailto:willem.ji...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 29 January 2013 08:25
> To: users@camel.apache.org (mailto:users@camel.apache.org)
> Subject: Re: issues with simple example
>
> It could be more safe to put the state into the exchange property, as the
&g
