I would second that. I like to provide superclasses for all of my
routebuilders. This way, I can "bake in" logic that all my routes get
for free. This doesn't work with Spring DSL.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:41 PM, thomas barker wrote:
> I much prefer java dsl for maintainability. Spring DSL is
I much prefer java dsl for maintainability. Spring DSL is fine for small,
simple routes that will never grow. As a response to the previous, I am
not sure I would use Camel if maintenance was done by non-devs.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Sam (Stephen Samuel)
wrote:
> IMO
>
> Pro Spring:
>
IMO
Pro Spring:
Can edit it "outside" the build, and by non-devs
Pro DSL:
Code completion / type checking
Easier refactoring.
BTW We just switched from spring to dsl.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Sri wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Which id DSL is good for project. Java DSL or Spring. I have used
