related changes).
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: deepaktaker [mailto:deepakta...@gmail.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 5. November 2015 04:12
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Data Corruption in SFTP in Parallel Multicast branches
Hi,
I would like to know if the jira CAMEL
Hi,
I would like to know if the jira CAMEL-8284 created for the bug "Data
Corruption in SFTP in Parallel Multicast branches" released as patch. i was
wondering if the patch is made available in camel version 2.14
Regards,
Deepak
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabb
Hello Lakshmi,
it could be that this issue is related to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8688
There we have made a patch in the current snapshot (version 2.16)
Can you try to reproduce your problem on the current snapshot?
Regards Franz
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:39 AM, lakshmi.pra
Hi,
If direct is changed to SEDA, the multiple branches still fail.
/Error processing exchange. Exchange[Message: [Body is instance of
org.apache.camel.StreamCache]]. Caused by: [org.quartz.JobExecutionException
- org.apache.camel.CamelExchangeException: Parallel processing failed for
number 0.
Hi
Have u tried replacing
With
Reji
-
Reji Mathews
Sr. Developer - Middleware Integration / SOA ( Open Source - Apache Camel &
Jboss Fuse ESB | Mule ESB )
LinkedIn - http://in.linkedin.com/pub/reji-mathews/31/9a2/40a
Twitter - reji_mathews
--
Vie
Try replacing the Multicast on the Recipient List with
parallelProcessing=true.
Multicast:
The Multicast allows to route the same message to a number of endpoints and
process them in a different way.
Recipient List:
The recipients will receive a copy of the same Exchange.
--
View this message
Hi,
We have another example of data corruption with Parallel Multicast. This
issue is there even in camel-core 2.14.2.
If we change to serial multicast, the issue disappears.
I have a route with a camel producer (to uri) that writes data in the
exchange & this data is of type stream cache
Hello Lakshmi and Stephan,
I created the bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8284
It does contain a solution proposal. Please have a look.
Regards Franz
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 8:46 AM, lakshmi.prashant
wrote:
> Hi Stephan,
>
>The body of the main exchange should be copied to t
: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: RE: Data Corruption in SFTP in Parallel Multicast branches
Hi Stephan,
The body of the main exchange should be copied to the branch exchanges,
as intended (Option 2 suggested by you).
But I am not sure if it will lead to performance / memory issues, if
there
Hi Stephan,
The body of the main exchange should be copied to the branch exchanges,
as intended (Option 2 suggested by you).
But I am not sure if it will lead to performance / memory issues, if
there are more branches with huge data in the body of the main route.
Thanks,
Lakshmi
--
Vi
Hi,
I have had a look into the source code:
If you look into the StreamCacheConverter an InputSteam will create a
StreamCache object by copying the data to a CachedOutputStream and then calling
the newStreamCache() method. That will generate a FileInputStreamCache or a
ByteArrayStreamCache. Bo
11 matches
Mail list logo