Re: DataFormat Versus TypeConverters

2014-04-02 Thread Raul Kripalani
Sorry for the delay, I missed the original post from February. This seems to me like a question on customising the Jackson bindings. Have you tried using the @JsonValue annotation? Have a look at [1]. [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13386930/why-doesnt-jsonunwrapped-work-for-lists HTH,

Re: DataFormat Versus TypeConverters

2014-04-01 Thread Raghu
Hi Yagyesh, Were you able to crack this? Even I have same problem and still not able to get any solution for this. If you done, can you share the code with me please? Thanks, Raghu -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DataFormat-Versus-TypeConverters-tp5747307p5

Re: DataFormat Versus TypeConverters

2014-02-16 Thread yagyesh
By calling a service over http , the response which i am getting is of format: [{"a":1,"b":2,"c":3},{"a":4,"b":5,"c":6}] So to map this i have public void configure() { from("direct:ab") .setHeader(HTTP_URI, simple(baseUrl + "/${header.aa}"))