Re: Distributed AggregationRepository

2014-01-09 Thread Raul Kripalani
Hi Claus, On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hmm I am not aware of such. > > camel-levedb is using same principle as the leveldb store in AMQ > http://activemq.apache.org/leveldb-store.html > > And allows concurrent and distributed reads/writes to the shared > store. eg use a s

Re: Distributed AggregationRepository

2014-01-09 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Raul Kripalani wrote: > Careful, HawtDB is deprecated, as advertised in the camel-hawtdb component > page. Unfortunately, the warning doesn't render in a shaded box any longer > (due to some recent Confluence migration), so it's easy to miss it. Sorry > about that.

Re: Distributed AggregationRepository

2014-01-08 Thread Henryk Konsek
Hi Tom, > Since we're going to run our system distributed (multiple containers in > Fuse Fabric) we need an alternative to the default > MemoryAggregationRepository. As Raul said, JDBC is the only real distributed option for a while. Keep in mind however that even if SQL performance might not be

Re: Distributed AggregationRepository

2014-01-08 Thread Raul Kripalani
Careful, HawtDB is deprecated, as advertised in the camel-hawtdb component page. Unfortunately, the warning doesn't render in a shaded box any longer (due to some recent Confluence migration), so it's easy to miss it. Sorry about that. LevelDB is recommended instead, but the technology has two lim