Re: Event driven producer?

2015-04-09 Thread mailingl...@j-b-s.de
Hi Christopher! Why not using an aggregator? Or you simply emit your messages 1:1 and set the message body to 'null' if there is nothing to send from your business logic perspective. You can simply use a filter afterward to drop all messages having a 'null' body to get your expected behaviour.

Re: Event Driven Producer :)

2010-03-17 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:00 PM, ankelee wrote: > > Alright I created the ticket. I have no idea how long it would take to do > though, so I just estimated 5 hours :) > We actually dont use those estimates. But 5 hours, that will be 5 beers :) > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2

Re: Event Driven Producer :)

2010-03-17 Thread ankelee
Alright I created the ticket. I have no idea how long it would take to do though, so I just estimated 5 hours :) https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2555 -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Event-Driven-Producer-%3A%29-tp27874120p27932529.html Sent from the Camel

Re: Event Driven Producer :)

2010-03-17 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:05 PM, ankelee wrote: > > And what if you wanted to use some data, like a header, from the old message? > Is this possible with the new Exchange? > -- Actually I dont think you got the old exchange around when using that wireTap new message thingy. It was meant for a sim

Re: Event Driven Producer :)

2010-03-17 Thread ankelee
And what if you wanted to use some data, like a header, from the old message? Is this possible with the new Exchange? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Event-Driven-Producer-%3A%29-tp27874120p27931086.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Event Driven Producer :)

2010-03-12 Thread leNerd
Hi Having seen >But Camel provides a variation of the wireTap which allows you to send >a new message >See section - sending a new Exchange >http://camel.apache.org/wire-tap.html i cannot believe that i haven't noticed the "sending an new Exchange" option myself, as the Wire Tap pattern was

Re: Event Driven Producer :)

2010-03-12 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:09 AM, leNerd wrote: > > Hi Forum > > I need a pattern that responds to a message by generating an entirely new > message, but not as response (like request-reply pattern). > I suppose you could describe my request as an Event Driven Producer :) > > Any suggestions would