Re: More complicated scenario for camel-bam

2012-01-11 Thread Łukasz Dywicki
Time is the best teacher. :) I've found a way to do a processing message after activity receives it - with interceptors. There some exceptions, but both persistence and processing works. Solutions looks next: interceptFrom("activemq:incoming") .split(body()) .multicast()

Re: More complicated scenario for camel-bam

2012-01-11 Thread Łukasz Dywicki
Hey Hadrian, I started investigating the camel-bam code and one from statements I wrote is not true. The Process name can be set by calling the ProcessBuilder constructor. The Process-N name is a default behaviour. Also, if it makes a sense to support delaying the activity? Eg making an activit

Re: More complicated scenario for camel-bam

2012-01-10 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
Lukasz, do you mind opening a jira with your findings? Thanks, Hadrian On 01/10/2012 06:36 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote: Hey everyone, I tried yo use camel-bam and it works for very basic example shown in documentation. It works well for correlating the files without any middle processing steps.