https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1528
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Naming-JMX-artifacts-from-Java-DSL-tp22986330p23033545.html
Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:19 AM, huntc wrote:
>
> Hi Claus,
>
> Yes, .id does exactly what I need. I think it is a useful method to keep as
> JMX is almost unusable without it - you have to trawl so many nodes
>
> In fact, I'd go as far as stating that I wouldn't bother creating a JMX node
> u
Hi Claus,
Yes, .id does exactly what I need. I think it is a useful method to keep as
JMX is almost unusable without it - you have to trawl so many nodes
In fact, I'd go as far as stating that I wouldn't bother creating a JMX node
unless the programmer identifies it. If the node is important
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:52 AM, huntc wrote:
>
> Hi Claus,
>
> .id would have been great - however it is deprecated and not part of v2.
Does .id in 1.x do what you want in the JMX console? If so we can undo
the @deprecation and add it back in 2.0.
It was removed as a part of a cleanup in the DSL
Hi Claus,
.id would have been great - however it is deprecated and not part of v2.
Kind regards,
Christopher
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Naming-JMX-artifacts-from-Java-DSL-tp22986330p23033229.html
Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:59 PM, huntc wrote:
>
> Is there an easy way to name routes and processors when declaring them via
> the Java DSL? I would like to see some more meaningful names displayed via
> JMX.
Hi
There should be some .id, .description and .group DSLs you can use.
>
> Thanks.
>
