Re: New Suggested Feature For Mina/Netty

2010-04-08 Thread Ashwin Karpe
Hi, Could you add suggestions and request for new features in the Camel Jira https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/Dashboard.jspa https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/Dashboard.jspa This way it can be tracked and used to improve camel capabilities in days to come. Thanks and keep the

Re: New Suggested Feature For Mina/Netty

2010-04-08 Thread anandsk
I have added improvement request for this feature. you may want to add comments for your specific needs if they are different. https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2624 anandsk wrote: > > I have a similar requirement but only difference is I do have a message to > send but I expect r

Re: New Suggested Feature For Mina/Netty

2010-04-07 Thread anandsk
I think Mina(not camel-mina) has a background thread for receiving messages. you can try it out and see whether you get multiple messages using a simple route. Gareth Collins wrote: > > Thanks for the response. > > I considered what you suggested. I didn't know how to deal with multiple > res

Re: New Suggested Feature For Mina/Netty

2010-04-07 Thread Gareth Collins
Thanks for the response. I considered what you suggested. I didn't know how to deal with multiple response messages per request though (I has understood that camel mina/netty components only supported "one request - one response"). thanks, Gareth anandsk wrote: > > I have a similar requiremen

Re: New Suggested Feature For Mina/Netty

2010-04-07 Thread anandsk
anandsk wrote: > > I have a similar requirement but only difference is I do have a message to > send but I expect async replies. so I would vote for suggested feature. > > Though it is not elegant I am thinking of using this solution for now, may > be it will work for you also and just send a

Re: New Suggested Feature For Mina/Netty

2010-04-07 Thread anandsk
I have a similar requirement but only difference is I do have a message to send but I expect replies in asyncronous fashion. so I would vote for suggested feature. Though it is not elegant I am thinking of using this solution for now, may be it will work for you also and just send a blank message