> Which OS are you running? Could you write that down in the JIRA as well.
I'm running Windows Vista Business Service Pack 2, 32 bit. I have put this
in the Jira (#CAMEL-2394)
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2394
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Renamer-f
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Andy Bourke wrote:
>
>
>> To use the log component you should just do
>>
>
>> http://camel.apache.org/log.html
>
> Ok, I've got it now. However, sending the output to the log rather than the
> file does not stop the rename issue. If it helps the actual error from
> To use the log component you should just do
>
> http://camel.apache.org/log.html
Ok, I've got it now. However, sending the output to the log rather than the
file does not stop the rename issue. If it helps the actual error from the
trace log is:
org.apache.camel.component.file.GenericFileOp
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Andy Bourke wrote:
>
> Please excuse my ignorance Claus, but I don't know what "log:foo" means, I
> have tried using it as you have written but I get an exception:
>
> org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The prefix "log" for element "log:info" is
> not bound
>
To use t
Please excuse my ignorance Claus, but I don't know what "log:foo" means, I
have tried using it as you have written but I get an exception:
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The prefix "log" for element "log:info" is
not bound
I have tried without using parallelProcessing="true" and the problem
rem
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Andy Bourke
> wrote:
>>
>> If I understand it right, the multicast allows the same payload to be
>> processed by multiple end points? If I remove the multicast then won't the
>> second enpoint (in the now non-
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Andy Bourke wrote:
>
> If I understand it right, the multicast allows the same payload to be
> processed by multiple end points? If I remove the multicast then won't the
> second enpoint (in the now non-multicast pipeline) try to process the output
> from the first
If I understand it right, the multicast allows the same payload to be
processed by multiple end points? If I remove the multicast then won't the
second enpoint (in the now non-multicast pipeline) try to process the output
from the first one?
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:20
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Andy Bourke wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am new to camel and have hit a problem that I hope someone can help me
> with.
>
> I have a route that looks for a file in a directory => unmarshals the file
> using => transforms the output from the unmarshal (which is
> List>
