Hi Study the examples here http://camel.apache.org/load-balancer.html
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:44 AM, mnl <mnlgoya...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am new to camel and trying to use failover loadbalancer. I have list of > endpoints (say, A, B, C) which can be used to send message such that if one > fails the endpoint next in the list can be tried. lets say B was success. > After successful send, B will receive an exchange which can be used to know > the status of the message sent earlier. > I have tried various versions for loadbalancer as: > > Case-1 > > from(fromEndpoint) > .errorHandler(defaultErrorHandler) > .loadbalance().failover() > .to(smppEndpointList) > .process(getSendProcessor); > >> This fails to use the processor returned by the getSendProcessor() and >> overall the flow fails. > > Now I change the above version to this. > > Case-2 > > from(fromEndpoint) > .errorHandler(defaultErrorHandler) > .to(smppEndpointList) > .process(getSendProcessor) > .loadbalance().failover(); > >> Here if the smppEndpointList has only one endpoint then the call is >> successful but in case of multiple endpints in the list it fails. Also >> from further debugging I found that the processor returned by >> getSendProcessor is not used over here > > Case-3 > > from(fromEndpoint) > .errorHandler(defaultErrorHandler) > .process(getSendProcessor) > .loadbalance().failover() > .to(smppEndpointList); > >> This also fails as the processor returned by getSendProcessor is not used. > > Can some one please suggest the correct implementation. I am stuck over this > for long. > Thanks > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Using-apache-camel-failover-loadbalancer-tp5778537.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
