Thanks Ashwin, EHCache has MBean which exposes all the statistics. I guess,
for now I can just expose it myself to mbean server.
Thanks for all the help :)
Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The other request regarding exposing cache statistics is a little more
> involved.
>
> I have created a
Hi,
The other request regarding exposing cache statistics is a little more
involved.
I have created a Jira entry for it and will try and add this feature in due
course.
Cheers,
Ashwin...
tide08 wrote:
>
> Thanks Claus! ArtifactID says springsource is it some customized version
> of ehCache
Hi Claus,
I fixed the sample cache creation issue and have checked in a patch
CAMEL-2363.
Cheers,
Ashwin...
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:19 PM, tide08 wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Claus! ArtifactID says springsource is it some customized version
>> of
>> ehCache we are using?
Hi,
No problem. I will clean out the other caches... I did not realize that
these were not commented out :)
Cheers,
Ashwin
tide08 wrote:
>
> Thanks Claus! ArtifactID says springsource is it some customized version
> of ehCache we are using? Reason I am asking is that I have conflict with
Hi,
The version of ehCache used by camel-cache is 1.6.2. This can however be
modified to an earlier or later version.
Cheers,
Ashwin...
tide08 wrote:
>
> Looks like Ashwin got on to this before I could submit mine.
>
> BTW..what version of ehCache does it use? It is not very clear from pom
Hi,
The version of ehCache used is 1.6.2.
This is however modifiable to a later or earlier version.
Cheers,
Ashwin...
tide08 wrote:
>
> Looks like Ashwin got on to this before I could submit mine.
>
> BTW..what version of ehCache does it use? It is not very clear from pom
> (and osgi is ne
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:19 PM, tide08 wrote:
>
> Thanks Claus! ArtifactID says springsource is it some customized version of
> ehCache we are using? Reason I am asking is that I have conflict with
> hibernate and I need to exclude ehCache dependency from either one of these.
>
Its the OSGi prob
Thanks Claus! ArtifactID says springsource is it some customized version of
ehCache we are using? Reason I am asking is that I have conflict with
hibernate and I need to exclude ehCache dependency from either one of these.
Also, I had another suggestion for cache component:
- Clean up ehCache.xm
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:32 AM, tide08 wrote:
>
> Looks like Ashwin got on to this before I could submit mine.
>
> BTW..what version of ehCache does it use? It is not very clear from pom (and
> osgi is new to me)
>
Check the parent/pm.xml which have versions listed.
Otherwise do a mvn dependen
Looks like Ashwin got on to this before I could submit mine.
BTW..what version of ehCache does it use? It is not very clear from pom (and
osgi is new to me)
Thanks!
tide08 wrote:
>
> Thanks! I will reply back when patch is ready.
>
>
>
> Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I created a ti
Thanks! I will reply back when patch is ready.
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I created a ticket for it
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2343
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Willem Jiang
>> wrote:
>>> I think we ca
Hi
I created a ticket for it
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2343
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Willem Jiang wrote:
>> I think we can support the InputStream and Serializable object at the same
>> time :)
>> If the Message b
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Willem Jiang wrote:
> I think we can support the InputStream and Serializable object at the same
> time :)
> If the Message body is Serializable, we can skip the InputStream part, if
> it's not, we can try to turn it into an InputStream.
>
> Any thought?
>
Yeah my
I think we can support the InputStream and Serializable object at the
same time :)
If the Message body is Serializable, we can skip the InputStream part,
if it's not, we can try to turn it into an InputStream.
Any thought?
BTW, any kind of contribution is welcome, so please feel free to submit
14 matches
Mail list logo