I removed reference to com.google.inject.internal here :
http://speedy.sh/NqCJ3/Removed-reference-to-com-google-inject-internal.patch
, this patch include Josep code. I removed some functionality while doing
so, that might lead to strange behavior. But the current tests in
camel-guice are running w
I tried the patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12561884/camel_guice_3.0.diff
A pom.xml had problems, I simply removed the lines and build it and tried
the camel-guice in an OSGI container. I could not get it to be active,
needing com.google.common.collect and com.google.inject.
Hi surya,
JSR-250 is indeed very helpful, and a proper port of camel would likely
have to implement some handling for this as Guice has not yet done so. See:
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=62 There is probably
an existing version that is compatible with Guice 3.0 as well, s
@Claus
It is disheartening to hear guiceyfruit is dead..I remember James/team
saying somewhere that he will pick up when possible and make it Guice 3.0
compatible, so is it not going to happen? I really like @JndiBind and
Jsr250 support offered by guiceyfruit with camel.
May I suggest not droppin
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4466
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4209
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Chris Narburgh
> wrote:
> > I would wholeheartedly agree. Guice 3.0 is the latest release with lots
> of
> >
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Chris Narburgh
wrote:
> I would wholeheartedly agree. Guice 3.0 is the latest release with lots of
> new useful features.
>
> Is there already a ticket for doing this?
>
No feel free to create a ticket, and if possible work on contributions.
> Thanks,
> - Chris
I would wholeheartedly agree. Guice 3.0 is the latest release with lots of
new useful features.
Is there already a ticket for doing this?
Thanks,
- Chris
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Chris Narburgh
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I came
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Chris Narburgh
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I came across an annoying problem today regarding Camel + Guiceyfruit.
> Camel 2.9.0, Guiceyfruit 2.0.
>
> The way that Guiceyfruit creates a GuiceCamelContext does not automatically
> use the Injector in the registry, as the Spr
Thank you Williem! It should be worth mentioning that this fix could be as
simple as creating a non-internals depending release of guiceyfruit.
That would allow people to use it in current versions of camel with no other
changes as well as later versions of camel to use.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3
Hi,
I just created a JIRA[1] to trace this issue.
[1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4209
On 7/9/11 12:42 AM, Tim wrote:
camel guice is using guice 2.0
Which wouldn't be so bad except that it uses things from the guice internal
packages.
This makes it impossible to use it alongside
Yep :)
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/google/inject/guice/3.0/
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Larry Meadors wrote:
> It's in the central repo, I believe.
>
>
>com.google.inject
>guice
>3.0
>
>
> Larry
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Claus Ibsen
> wrote:
> > Is guice 3.
It's in the central repo, I believe.
com.google.inject
guice
3.0
Larry
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Is guice 3.0 in any maven repository?
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Tim wrote:
>> camel guice is using guice 2.0
>> Which wouldn't be so bad excep
Is guice 3.0 in any maven repository?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Tim wrote:
> camel guice is using guice 2.0
> Which wouldn't be so bad except that it uses things from the guice internal
> packages.
> This makes it impossible to use it alongside guice 3.0
>
> I can't see any new version of
I don't suggest your start the ActiveMQ Broker (Using TCP transport)
with Guice in the same time you start up the Camel Context.
If you have multi Camel Contexts which share same ActiveMQ broker, that
will cause some troubles.
How about to write a ActiveMQ Module to wrap the start and stop methods
14 matches
Mail list logo
