Re: camel-sap

2025-04-04 Thread Federico Mariani
Hello Chirag, The SAP license is not compatible with Apache rules, so the Apache Camel community cannot offer the camel-sap component, but there are commercial solutions that offer support for camel-sap. Regards, Federico Il giorno sab 22 mar 2025 alle ore 03:16 Chirag ha scritto: > Fuse had a

Re: camel-sap

2025-03-24 Thread Chirag
Thank you for pointing me to this repository. Will explore how we can use this. regards, On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 11:45 AM Aurélien Pupier wrote: > Hi Chirag, > > The source code is available here > > https://github.com/jboss-fuse/fuse-components/tree/camel-4.10.2-branch/camel-sap > . > Take ca

Re: camel-sap

2025-03-24 Thread Aurélien Pupier
Hi Chirag, The source code is available here https://github.com/jboss-fuse/fuse-components/tree/camel-4.10.2-branch/camel-sap . Take care of the licensing when using it. Pull requests can be provided to this repository. Regards, On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 4:12 PM Chirag wrote: > I understand that

Re: camel-sap

2025-03-24 Thread Chirag
I understand that. Just trying to understand what happens to fusesource sap components. The source code for some of those is published by fuse/Redhat/IBM - but if they do bcome part of respective "git" (not part of apache camel), community members can review/submit PR / validate if these can be "s

Re: Camel SAP component

2016-03-02 Thread Christian Schneider
You could also take a look at hibersap (http://hibersap.org/example/ and https://github.com/hibersap/hibersap). It allows to create java code and mappings to access SAP in a very convenient way. It is not a camel component but I have used it together with camel in a customer project. Christian

Re: Camel SAP component

2016-03-02 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi camel-sap is part of the commercial Red Hat JBoss Fuse product. If you are a subscriber of jboss fuse, then you can use that component. At Apache Camel we cannot provide such sap component due sap libraries are in violation with ASF terms. On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Michal Vich wrote