Re: ws-security

2014-07-10 Thread ychawla
Can you try to create a new exchange or use the out exchange when calling the proxied service? In my code, I have a special processor which copies a few headers to the out exchange and then calls it. This will remove all the exchange headers from the original exchange and remove a lot of the Came

Re: ws-security

2014-07-06 Thread Lambert, Michael
My impression was that cxf was supported to remove the headers automatically when it processed them. Switching everything to POJO doesnt solve the problem. The proxied service still recieves the WS-Security headers (even though they were already taken care of my the proxy). This is the output using

Re: ws-security

2014-07-06 Thread Willem Jiang
If you switch the data format to POJO, you should not see the security header any more. If you still need to use PAYLOAD data format, you need to clean up the soap header of the payload message, as camel-cxf doesn’t put the soap header into camel message header. -- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc.

Re: WS-Security testing with Camel

2013-09-09 Thread Christian Müller
Use the camel-cxf component [1]. The documentation at [2] is also helpful to get started. [1] http://camel.apache.org/cxf.html [2] http://cxf.apache.org/docs/ws-security.html Best, Christian - Software Integration Specialist Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team