Good point!
I'll stop asking me questions and go further with approach #1 ;-)
On 09/11/13 10:48, "Claus Ibsen" wrote:
>Hi
>
>Yeah but converting to a type with generics is hard due type erasure.
>So Camel has a hard time to match that Iterator is what you
>want, and not Iterator in case somethi
o the basic question of how/where should I handle the
> unmarshalling...
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Read-and-process-very-large-files-tp5742889p5742919.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nab
w this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Read-and-process-very-large-files-tp5742889p5742919.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
a "Camel point of view" ?
> How is streaming handled in this case ?
> Is there any better way of handling this case ?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Read-and-process-very-large-files-tp5742889.html
> Sent f
l items
What do you think ?
(2)
I was wondering if a better approach would be something like:
from("file:incoming")
.convertBodyTo(Iteratorhttp://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Read-and-process-very-large-files-tp5742889.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
