Re: Restlet Component Fault Handling

2009-02-27 Thread William Tam
> View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Restlet-Component-Fault-Handling-tp22173327p22248469.html > Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

Re: Restlet Component Fault Handling

2009-02-27 Thread tfredrich
). --Todd -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Restlet-Component-Fault-Handling-tp22173327p22248469.html Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Restlet Component Fault Handling

2009-02-26 Thread William Tam
>> message (for camel to terminate the pipeline). >> >> Now for the question:  Is this the way I should be doing things?  Or >> could/should the DefaultRestletBinding utilize the fault message to compose >> its response, if a fault message exists?  Your feedback

Re: Restlet Component Fault Handling

2009-02-26 Thread William Tam
ld/should the DefaultRestletBinding utilize the fault message to compose > its response, if a fault message exists?  Your feedback is much appreciated. > > Thanks, > --Todd > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Restlet-Component-Fault-Handling-tp22173327p22173327.html > Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

Re: Restlet Component Fault Handling

2009-02-25 Thread Claus Ibsen
that does not adhere to fault. And take a look in the source code for restlet. Compare it with camel-http that should honor the fault stuff. You might find a gremlin and can point out the problem so we can fix it faster. > > Thanks, > --Todd > -- > View this message in context: >

Restlet Component Fault Handling

2009-02-23 Thread tfredrich
ompose its response, if a fault message exists? Your feedback is much appreciated. Thanks, --Todd -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Restlet-Component-Fault-Handling-tp22173327p22173327.html Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.