On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Guillaume Yziquel
wrote:
> Le Monday 23 Apr 2012 à 16:20:35 (+0200), Claus Ibsen a écrit :
>> Yeah go for #1.
>
> Always? Because I read from
>
> http://irclogs.dankulp.com/logs/irclogger_log/camel?date=2011-09-09,Fri&text=on
>
> that using unit of work seems to pr
Le Monday 23 Apr 2012 à 16:20:35 (+0200), Claus Ibsen a écrit :
> Yeah go for #1.
Always? Because I read from
http://irclogs.dankulp.com/logs/irclogger_log/camel?date=2011-09-09,Fri&text=on
that using unit of work seems to provide a more easily accessible
history of messages. I was wondering to
Yeah go for #1.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Guillaume Yziquel
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm currently trying to trace Camel routes, and I'm wondering at how I
> should query Camel Exchanges for the 'From endpoint' (i.e. the original
> consumer). It seems to me that I have two options, that behave
>
Hi.
I'm currently trying to trace Camel routes, and I'm wondering at how I
should query Camel Exchanges for the 'From endpoint' (i.e. the original
consumer). It seems to me that I have two options, that behave
differently, but I cannot figure out why...
[1] exchange.getFromEndpoint().getEndpointU
