g.class)
method, or am I missing something obvious?
Would i.e. a beanRef(SomeBusinessBean.class) extension be possible (or even
a good thing?), using type-safety and Registry lookup's?
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Typesafe-Bean-injection-in-routes-using-Registry-tp5092420p5092420.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ct)
> }
>
> ...but I guess that this creates a singleton bean as it is given at route
> definition?
>
> Are my assumptions correct that I should only use the beanRef(String.class)
> method, or am I missing something obvious?
>
> Would i.e. a beanRef(SomeBusinessBean.c
ies and in multi concurrent scenarios (are my objects scoped as
singletons/prototypes, etc..).
Would love to continue the discussion, thanks for your response!
/Billy
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Typesafe-Bean-injection-in-routes-using-Registry-tp5092420p51
in multi concurrent scenarios (are my objects scoped as
> singletons/prototypes, etc..).
>
> Would love to continue the discussion, thanks for your response!
>
> /Billy
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Typesafe-Bean-in